Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

2018-10-29 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 24/10/2018 22:49, Mike Jones wrote: 3.1, 3.2, and 4.1, parameter definitions: None of these parameter definitions specify the syntax of the parameters defined, making understanding these quite confusing.  Yes, this is talked about later in the doc but there are not even forward references

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

2018-10-24 Thread Mike Jones
e JSON example's don't. Thank you, -- Mike -Original Message- From: Ace On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 2:35 PM To: ace@ietf.org Subject: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-param

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

2018-10-23 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 22/10/2018 21:09, Jim Schaad wrote: Here are my WGLC comments: * I am not sure that I understand what the protocol flow is when JAR is being used. Is there a potential case where a JWT would be used as the structure of an OAuth response? If so then is there a problem with defining cnf in

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

2018-10-22 Thread Jim Schaad
Here are my WGLC comments: * I am not sure that I understand what the protocol flow is when JAR is being used. Is there a potential case where a JWT would be used as the structure of an OAuth response? If so then is there a problem with defining cnf in section 4.1? * We need to have a OAuth