[Ace] Removal of the Client Token from ACE-OAuth draft

2018-02-01 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, the Client Token is a new mechanism in the ACE-OAuth that aims to solve a scenario where the Client does not have connectivity to the Authorization Server to obtain an access token while the Resource Server does. The solution is therefore for the Client to use the Resource Server to

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

2018-02-01 Thread Sandeep Kumar
As co-author, I support adoption of the draft as WG document. There is need in industry and multiple standardization bodies for this draft. Regards Sandeep -Original Message- From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 9:23 PM To:

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

2018-02-01 Thread Shahid Raza
As a co-author, I also strongly support the adoption of this draft as a WG document. Recall that , we already have an implementation of this draft, both in constrained devices (SICS Contiki) and in the Nexus CA software. Recently, we have also implemented the "integration of this draft into

Re: [Ace] Removal of the Client Token from ACE-OAuth draft

2018-02-01 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:59:48PM +, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > the Client Token is a new mechanism in the ACE-OAuth that aims to solve a > scenario where the Client does not have connectivity to the Authorization > Server to obtain an access token while the Resource Server

Re: [Ace] Removal of the Client Token from ACE-OAuth draft

2018-02-01 Thread Mike Jones
I agree with Hannes and Ben that the Client Token is speculative in nature, solving a problem that's it's not clear that we even have. It certainly isn't OAuth. I already made this point in my earlier comprehensive review of the spec, but I'll repeat again here. Please remove it!

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

2018-02-01 Thread Eliot Lear
Hi Jim, I agree that this document should be adopted.  I am willing to review and comment. Eli On 30.01.18 21:23, Jim Schaad wrote: > This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of > the document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at > the