On Jul 5, 2023, at 4:09 AM, Eliot Lear via Datatracker wrote:
> 3. The terminology is a problem. On the one hand, some people like
> to use the terms "IoT Device" and "Controller". In the EAP world,
> this term is meaningless. We use "peer", "authenticator", and
> "authentication server". I
Reviewer: Eliot Lear
Review result: On the Right Track
This draft provides a means for EAP authentication via CoAP. This is
an evolution on top of EAPoL/EAP so as to not require 802.1X on
certain classes of devices. The general goal of reusing existing EAP
methods – and code – is admirable.
I
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your time to review the document.
On 27/6/23 03:55, Paul Wouters wrote:
Hi,
I have three questions, in order of importance :)
Why does "CoAP-EAP Exporter Label" need to be an IANA registry? These
are free
form strings, no limited numbers, etc. If there is a risk
