Hello all:
We submitted some time ago an I-D proposing the use of an active (D)TLS Record
(e.g. running DTLS over CoAP or presenting a token with crypto material that is
used to create the required keys for the DTLS record) to provide application
level security for CoAP.
P header fields, options and data can be protected with DTLS (hence
> DTLS record) regardless of the key exchange mechanism. Is it intended as an
> alternative to OSCOAP/EDHOC?
> Thanks,
> Panos
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org]