Dear Spring Community
I'm pleased to announce the Acegi Security System for Spring release
0.6.1 is now available from http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net. The
project provides comprehensive security services for The Spring Framework.
FEATURES:
* It is ready NOW
* Easy to use and deploy (eg see
App Fuse mailing list wrote:
ok, so the term voter is specific to Acegisecurity etc, and not a
wider used term in Spring, IOC, AOP etc. that I have missed?
I'll look at the code and see what I understand :-)
Thanks Justin
Justin, net.sf.acegisecurity.vote.RoleVoter is an Acegi
Security-specific
bryan wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know how many of you come from a systems administration/*nix background
but there is a really cool feature that you can use with linux
iptables ( and yes I know
bsd is better ... yawn ).
The feature is called portsentry and what it does is this.
1) Creates listen
ok, so the term voter is specific to Acegisecurity etc, and not a wider
used term in Spring, IOC, AOP etc. that I have missed?
I'll look at the code and see what I understand :-)
Thanks Justin
On Sep 24, 2004, at 5:37 PM, March, Andres wrote:
A voter is defined in the documentation. Don't know i
A voter is defined in the documentation. Don't know if you are asking
what one is or how I applied it. The voter is registered with an
interceptor that is applied to my business methods. So anywhere I want
to secure objects involved in a business method I register the
interceptor on them.
> -
What does "voter" apply to in these case?
Thanks Justin
The only other thing that I added which I find extremely valuable is a
voter for ACL security. The ACL package does not include this but I
find it is the best manner in which to check access on an instance.
--
Everything in the acl package is specifically for this purpose. It is
fairly well documented but the best way to learn is to look at the test
cases.
I am using the ACL stuff for instance based security but have a
different data model, so I wrote my own DAO to return ACL entries. I
really like th
+1 for Apache guidelines.
+1 for 0.6.1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ricardo Matinata
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Release 0.61
IMHO :
+1 for Apache guidelines.
IMHO :
+1 for Apache guidelines.
+1 for 0.6.1 (same reason as Ben).
---
Ricardo
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:52:44 +1000, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott McCrory wrote:
>
> >No objections - "release early and release often..." But are you sure it's
> >just a 0.61 release? I'd recommend
Ben Alex wrote:
Scott McCrory wrote:
No objections - "release early and release often..." But are you
sure it's just a 0.61 release? I'd recommend 0.7, as most
non-programmers (and some bit twiddlers too) consider anything prior
to 1.0 not mature enough for production, and I think Acegi is a l
March, Andres wrote:
+1 for Apache guidelines
And +1 for a 1.0 release after a maven build is implemented
I concur
--
Dr. Sean Radford, MBBS, MSc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bladesys.demon.co.uk/
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE TH
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:40:48 -0500, Scott McCrory wrote
> The best example I've seen
> on this is (although embedded in the service code) the
> ContactManagerFacade.java code in Acegi's samples.
Actually I mistated this - it's NOT embedded in ContactManagerFacade's
service code since it fronts
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:53:12 +0100, App Fuse mailing list wrote
> hi all,
>
> I'm just starting to learn about acegisecurity. I've been looking
> at the archive and was just wondering what the current status of:
>
> Instance security in .61
> Documentation on the above.
> Example applications/
hi all,
I'm just starting to learn about acegisecurity. I've been looking at
the archive and was just wondering what the current status of:
Instance security in .61
Documentation on the above.
Example applications/code using above.
newbie :-)
Thanks !!!
--
sorry meant to correct spelling before sending this.
Hi all,
I don't know how many of you come from a systems administration/*nix background
but there is a really cool feature that you can use with linux
iptables ( and yes I know
bsd is better ... yawn ).
The feature is called portsentry and wh
Hi all,
I don't know how many of you come from a systems administration/*nix background
but there is a really cool feature that you can use with linux
iptables ( and yes I know
bsd is better ... yawn ).
The feature is called portsentry and what it does is this.
1) Creates listeners on a rand
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:57:38 -0700, March, Andres wrote
> +1 for Apache guidelines
>
> And +1 for a 1.0 release after a maven build is implemented
>
+1 to what he said :-) .
Scott
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be
17 matches
Mail list logo
