Andreas Schildbach wrote:
Hello everyone,
I was just wondering why my HttpSessionIntegrationFilter does not save
my custom user object to the next request...
For my application, I have extended SecureContext to
SecureUserContext, adding my domain object for users as a property.
Looking at the s
Ben,
Just a note that the official source that Olivier posted for LDAP
support is here:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-362
The one's we're using, which are slightly modified (to include
LdapDaoSupport) are here:
http://www.uportal.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cas3/adapto
Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
Ben,
how about start using JIRA for Acegi release/issue management? I could create
a project for JIRA in Spring JIRA installation. Would it be appropriate, taking
into consideration that Acegi is not the official Spring subproject?
Dmitriy.
Thanks for the offer, but
Ben,
how about start using JIRA for Acegi release/issue management? I could create
a project for JIRA in Spring JIRA installation. Would it be appropriate, taking
into consideration that Acegi is not the official Spring subproject?
Dmitriy.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Alex <[EMAIL
Robert r. Sanders wrote:
While I don't have a huge amount of spare time, I would be glad to
look over any list of tasks you have and see if I could fit any of
them in. I tried to look on the sourceforge site and see if there
were any bug/feature lists but couldn't find any.
Hi Robert
Given you
If any members of the community have some spare time, I'd really
appreciate some help on the increasingly-busy forums and/or with code.
I have a detailed list of new feature proposals and refactorings
(primarily based on forum feedback) so there are plenty of things to
go on with. This is a go
Matt Raible wrote:
This looks very cool - anything to cut down the amount of XML needed
for Acegi Security is a good thing IMO.
I just finished my chapter on security for Spring Live - do you think
I should scrap the old stuff and update it to reflect this "new way"?
If so, when will 0.8.0 (or
Thanks Ben , that's a vote for sanity in a world filled with overly
verbose XML files.
--b
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:07:00 -0700, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks very cool - anything to cut down the amount of XML needed for
> Acegi Security is a good thing IMO.
>
> I just finis
This looks very cool - anything to cut down the amount of XML needed for
Acegi Security is a good thing IMO.
I just finished my chapter on security for Spring Live - do you think I
should scrap the old stuff and update it to reflect this "new way"? If
so, when will 0.8.0 (or will be it 1.0) b
