Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] maven build from cvs failing

2005-07-13 Thread Seth Ladd
I haven't received any changes from CVS lately, so the test fails for me as well. Seth I've done same test now (13/07) and have same error. Paulo On 7/11/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seth Ladd wrote: [junit] Running

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Security advisory for all Acegi Security users

2005-07-12 Thread Seth Ladd
Scott McCrory wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:18:33 -0500, Ray Krueger wrote Yes, unfortunately it does. Acegi 0.8.2 requires Spring 1.2. -Ray Ahh, thought so. No joy for those of us still running in JDK 1.3 containers like Websphere 5. Just a general statement, but there are a LOT of

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Contexts left in ThreadLocal, leading to user switching?

2005-07-11 Thread Seth Ladd
Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: Seth, we've also experienced the same behavior in one of our apps (the setup is pretty much the same: Acegy 0.7, jdk 1.4, Tomcat 5.0.28). I don't think it's a known Acegi bug, which it might be. What makes you think it's /not/ Acegi? If you're experiencing the same

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Contexts left in ThreadLocal, leading to user switching?

2005-07-11 Thread Seth Ladd
0.7.0 used the old well-known-request model, which was dependent on AbstractIntegrationFilter: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/acegisecurity/acegisecurity/core/src/main/java/net/sf/acegisecurity/ui/Attic/AbstractIntegrationFilter.java?rev=1.7view=auto Reading the code shows no

[Acegisecurity-developer] maven build from cvs failing

2005-07-11 Thread Seth Ladd
Hello, I'm trying to build the latest from CVS. Looks like one of the tests is failing: [junit] Running net.sf.acegisecurity.util.WebXmlToAcegiSecurityConverterTest s [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.032 sec [junit] [ERROR] TEST

[Acegisecurity-developer] Contexts left in ThreadLocal, leading to user switching?

2005-07-08 Thread Seth Ladd
Hello, We are experiencing this very odd situation, and am hoping that others have experienced it. Once in a while, when a user logs in, they will have someone else's information for their user details. We are using Acegi 0.7, Spring 1.1.5, and JDK 1.4, with Tomcat 5.0. We are using CAS

[Acegisecurity-developer] Turn On Subscribe Request Verification?

2005-02-25 Thread Seth Ladd
Hello, Ben, is it possible to turn on the Subscribe Request Verification for this mailing list? It would stop the spam we see to this list. It's a mailman parameter, I believe. Thanks! Seth -- a href=http://www.picklematrix.net/foaf.rdf;Seth Ladd's FOAF/a a

[Acegisecurity-developer] Adding getUserPrincipal to ContextHolderAwareRequestWrapper

2005-02-04 Thread Seth Ladd
Hello, I'd like to propose we add getUserPrincipal to ContextHolderAwareRequestWrapper. We can return the Authentication, which itself is a Principal. Thoughts? Thanks! Seth -- a href=http://www.picklematrix.net/foaf.rdf;Seth Ladd's FOAF/a a href=http://www.foaf-project.org/;What is FOAF?/a

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Adding getUserPrincipal to ContextHolderAwareRequestWrapper

2005-02-04 Thread Seth Ladd
Seth Ladd wrote: Hello, I'd like to propose we add getUserPrincipal to ContextHolderAwareRequestWrapper. We can return the Authentication, which itself is a Principal. The Simple patch for this has been attached. Thanks! Seth -- a href=http://www.picklematrix.net/foaf.rdf;Seth Ladd's FOAF

[Acegisecurity-developer] Where to find retroweaver-1.0fcs.jar?

2005-02-04 Thread Seth Ladd
Hello, I'm trying to build acegi with maven, and now it's time to find and download retroweaver-1.0fcs.jar. Unfortunately, ibiblio doesn't have it, and only version 1.1 is available from sourceforge (or so it seems). Google also doesn't know about it. Does anyone have a tip on where to find

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Work to Propogate Security Context across Remote Hessian calls?

2004-12-20 Thread Seth Ladd
Ben Alex wrote: Seth Ladd wrote: Hello, Has anyone done any work to propogate the security context across remote hessian calls? It seems very straight forward, and wanted to see if previous work had been done. Thanks very much, Seth Hi Seth No, it's not yet done. I was hoping we could automate