Ben Alex wrote:
For the small minority of people who have chosen NOT to extend User
(which goes against our recommendations, but there are legitimate
scenarios such as having a domain object that already represents the
user), I don't think adding two methods to their implementation is
going to
Ben,
Finally I have jaas CredentialsExpiredException and
AccountExpiredException working under acegi security integrated in JBoss
container.
The modifications on acegi were quite simple.
First I have created 2 new Exceptions named:
net.sf.acegisecurity.AccountExpiredException
Ben,
What do you mean by container integration deprecation?
Does it mean that the adapters package will dissapear in a next future or
do you plan to move them to a sort of components sandbox?
Sergio.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
Ben
Ben,
Excellent, sounds like a well thought-out plan towards 1.0.
I'd recommend an in-between approach for the container adapters. I
agree that including lightly-used, non-portable modules in the main
distribution can lead to expectations that they be maintained as fully as the
core.
Sergio Berna wrote:
I have added ExpirationDetails as a separate interface to keep backwards
compatibility with existing code that implementes UserDetails.
Hi Sergio
Good to see backward compatibility is a priority, particular in such a
sensitive (ie commonly-deployed and extended) area as