Re: [Ach] Network Operations Division Cryptographic Requirements

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:25:27 + Aaron Zauner wrote: > Yeah, it's not really up to date. I guess purging the first 1024 > bytes in the bitstream of RC4 would make bias attacks far harder as > the biases are at the beginning of the stream. In general this seems > to be stupid

Re: [Ach] Network Operations Division Cryptographic Requirements

> On 08 Mar 2017, at 12:25, Aaron Zauner wrote: > >> >> On 08 Mar 2017, at 01:33, Hanno Böck wrote: >> >> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:11:03 + >> Aaron Zauner wrote: >> >>> For review: >>>

Re: [Ach] Network Operations Division Cryptographic Requirements

> On 07 Mar 2017, at 16:11, Aaron Zauner wrote: > > For review: > https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/files/NOD%20Cryptographic%20Requirements%20v1.1%20TOP%20SECRET.pdf > > :) > Wow, let's systematically compare our recommendations :) -- // L. Aaron Kaplan -