Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-05.txt

Aaron, Yes, this is intentional and it's due to a slight difference in the mechanics between the two mechanisms. While the RFC 8823 mechanism can generate a unique "from" email address for each challenge (e.g. the document example " acme-challenge+2i211oi1204...@example.com") that the client can us

[Acme] Interim Meeiting Minutes

Hi. I’ve posted the minutes to datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2021-acme-01/materials/minutes-interim-2021-acme-01-202109291400-00 Let me know if somethi

Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-05.txt

Brian, Fantastic, thank you for the responses! One further comment inline. On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:28 PM Brian Sipos wrote: > BS1: This is to handle a basic property that BP bundles are necessarily > independent units, unidirectional, and (currently) have no "conversation" > or "flow" associa