Re: [Acme] Allow get for certificates?

The 10/08/2018 09:49, Yaron Sheffer wrote: > IMO Richard's proposal is too coarse, in the sense that servers may want to > publish some certificates with GET and others with POST-as-GET. So either > this should not be a server-wide flag, or if it is, it should be augmented > by a per-Order flag

[Acme] singapore draft minutes

Hi all, The draft minutes are here: https://github.com/thomas-fossati/acme-minutes/blob/master/ietf-100.md Please check if they are OK (IIRC I missed a couple of names). If you have corrections or additions to make, please provide PRs. Cheers, thanks

Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-star-00.txt

Hi Martin, Thanks for your review. On 19/06/2017, 23:34, "Acme on behalf of Martin Thomson" wrote: > > A few brief comments on this draft. > > On 16 June 2017 at 22:19, wrote: > This memo proposes an

Re: [Acme] Call for adoption STAR (short-term automatically-renewed) certificates

Hi Richard, On 12/06/2017, 21:26, "Richard Barnes" wrote: > I'm still not convinced of the need for the other interface here, Despite appearances, the "other" interface is not an internal one. The actors are separate business entities, which vary in time and space: - a CDN

Re: [Acme] Call for adoption STAR (short-term automatically-renewed) certificates

Hi Russ, On 08/06/2017, 20:56, "Acme on behalf of Russ Housley" wrote: > After very quickly looking at the document, I am not clear which > parts will make up the ACME extensions.  I need more clarity to > offer an opinion. The new

Re: [Acme] Futures

Hi Rich, > On 25/04/2017 19:14, "Salz, Rich" wrote: > > We have recently published [1] and started implementing it. > > > > The plan is to get the code running ASAP (surely before Prague) and, if the > > experiment is satisfactory, ask for adoption. > > > > Cheers, t > > > >

Re: [Acme] Futures

Hi Rich, On 21/04/2017 19:01, "Acme on behalf of Salz, Rich" wrote: > Does anyone have any new work items that would be ready to discuss in July?  > Any rechartering discussion that looks promising?  If so, please post to the > mailing list