Re: [Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)

2022-10-20 Thread Brian Sipos
All, I'm reposting here to confirm that in a different thread I identified the DTN draft which modifies the IANA registry [1] as a necessary companion to the ACME document. The DTN document purely updates the IANA registry and has no other substantial content. [1]

[Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)

2022-10-20 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Thanks, Marc. I've sent a message to the document's authors, chairs, and ADs. Amanda On Thu Oct 20 23:44:09 2022, marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca wrote: > I think this request should be in the hands of the DTN co-chairs or > the author to add additional text to the document or have another > document.

Re: [Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)

2022-10-20 Thread Marc Blanchet
I think this request should be in the hands of the DTN co-chairs or the author to add additional text to the document or have another document. I don’t think, as one of the two designated expert for that registry, it is us, the designated experts, to decide a new structure of the registry

[Acme] [IANA #1217636] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-08 (bundle)

2022-10-20 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Dear Bundle Administrative Record Types experts (cc: acme WG), Resending this question about a new bundle registry field in a document on next Thursday's telechat agenda. If the document continues to include the new "Protocol Version" field, but doesn't tell us to add the field to the registry