I don't have much to add, but...
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 05:44:39PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 15/07/2019 17:00, Ted Hardie wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > A reply in-line.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Stephen Farrell
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> > So, if I were personally
Hiya,
On 15/07/2019 17:00, Ted Hardie wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> A reply in-line.
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
>
>>
> So, if I were personally configuring a similar system, I would avoid
> ..well-known, because it makes the information available to anyone who polls
>
Hiya,
On 15/07/2019 18:30, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote:
> This seems like a clever idea! As Ted said, .well-known probably isn't
> the right directory for it. If you put something in .well-known, that
> suggests you plan to standardize it and register it with IANA.
Sure, I'm not scared of
This seems like a clever idea! As Ted said, .well-known probably isn't
the right directory for it. If you put something in .well-known, that
suggests you plan to standardize it and register it with IANA.
I'll also note that you may have a bootstrapping problem: Assuming that
you verify
Howdy,
A reply in-line.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> I've a couple of questions as to 1) whether there are
> any security issues with a thing I've done, (described
> below) and 2) if it'd be worthwhile documenting something
> like this.
>
> I've been
Hiya,
I've a couple of questions as to 1) whether there are
any security issues with a thing I've done, (described
below) and 2) if it'd be worthwhile documenting something
like this.
I've been working on encrypted SNI and as part of that
have built a test server. It seems sensible that some
