Re: [Acme] acme-subdomains RFC8499 vs. CA/B terminology

2021-12-12 Thread Deb Cooley
Sounds like a good path forward. Deb Cooley deco...@nsa.gov On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 9:04 AM Daniel Migault wrote: > I also prefer 8499 terminology. > Yours, > Daniel > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:40 AM Owen Friel (ofriel) 40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> I mentioned it at IETF 112 that

Re: [Acme] acme-subdomains RFC8499 vs. CA/B terminology

2021-12-10 Thread Daniel Migault
I also prefer 8499 terminology. Yours, Daniel On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:40 AM Owen Friel (ofriel) wrote: > I mentioned it at IETF 112 that we needed to decide on use of RFC8499 vs. > CA/B forum terminology in the document. > > > > As this document is not specific to Web PKI use cases, I prefer

[Acme] acme-subdomains RFC8499 vs. CA/B terminology

2021-12-10 Thread Owen Friel (ofriel)
I mentioned it at IETF 112 that we needed to decide on use of RFC8499 vs. CA/B forum terminology in the document. As this document is not specific to Web PKI use cases, I prefer RFC8499 terminology. Martin expressed that preference too: