Re: [Acme] Support for domains with redundant but not immediately synchronized servers

There's a fairly good solution available with the current protocol, which is to serve a (long lived) redirect from /.well-known/acme-challenge/ on all of the servers to a different URL that is always answered by the machine you run an ACME client on. Are there any cases where that is sufficiently

Re: [Acme] Support for domains with redundant but not immediately synchronized servers

This seems to be a common problem, so I opened a PR that someone on that project can merge. On 4 December 2015 at 08:08, Salz, Rich wrote: >> Should I open an issue on the protocol draft repository? (Which I assume is >> at [1]) >> [1]:

Re: [Acme] Support for domains with redundant but not immediately synchronized servers

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Peter Eckersley wrote: > There's a fairly good solution available with the current protocol, > which is to serve a (long lived) redirect from > /.well-known/acme-challenge/ on all of the servers to a different URL > that is always answered by the