Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-ip-00.txt

2017-07-19 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 07/19/2017 07:39 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > In this case, I disagree. With names, there is an expectation that > certificates can be issued for them. This is not the default case for > IP addresses Why do you say that issuance is disallowed by default for most IP addresses? The CA/Browser

Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-ip-00.txt

2017-07-19 Thread Martin Thomson
On 19 July 2017 at 03:45, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 07/17/2017 10:48 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> The biggest concern I have is the text regarding certificate lifetime >> and the handling of the possibility that IP addresses are dynamically >> allocated. This seems a little

Re: [Acme] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-acme-07.txt

2017-07-19 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
What about the payload? would you return "challenges" or "authorization? Regards, Rifaat On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 07/18/2017 10:13 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > Take a look at the following exchange with Jacob: >