Re: [Acme] Resend: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-acme-07]

2017-11-16 Thread Salz, Rich
Thank you for the detailed feedback! As announced at the meeting on Thursday, the editor’s plan is to address the major technical issue and start looking at your review. We’ll put out another draft, and perhaps do a limited WGLC that focuses on just the not-purely-editorial changes.

[Acme] Discussion of draft-ietf-acme-ip

2017-11-16 Thread Roland Bracewell Shoemaker
Hey all, First off I'd like to apologize for requesting an agenda item then not making it to the meeting to discuss it. It seems that while I had the right time in my calendar I managed to get the wrong day. The point of the draft is to provide a method for validating the control of IP addresses

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-16 Thread Daniel McCarney
I think this is a solid proposal addressing a real need. I'm +1 for supporting it both in spec and in Boulder/Pebble. Thanks Jacob, On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > In previous versions of ACME, there was sometimes a need to return > multiple

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-16 Thread Martin Thomson
Oh, my bad, my eyes turn out to be a terrible JSON parser. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Matthew A. Miller wrote: > On 17/11/16 16:47, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: >> On 11/16/2017 12:45 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: >>> I don't know what a random JSON parser

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-16 Thread Matthew A. Miller
On 17/11/16 16:47, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 11/16/2017 12:45 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> I don't know what a random JSON parser would do with your stacked error >> codes. > I don't understand. What I'm proposing is an array of JSON objects under > the sub-problems field, which should be

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-16 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 11/16/2017 12:45 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I don't know what a random JSON parser would do with your stacked error codes. I don't understand. What I'm proposing is an array of JSON objects under the sub-problems field, which should be supported by any JSON parser.

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-16 Thread Martin Thomson
Have you considered json text sequences: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7464 ? I don't know what a random JSON parser would do with your stacked error codes. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 11/15/2017 07:07 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: >> Following