Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-21 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 11/21/2017 04:06 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I ask because your example highlighted two types of problems. That > they could be aggregated doesn't seem an necessary or innate property. > > The difficulty with the sort of aggregation design you propose is that > you need to aggregate and I

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-21 Thread Martin Thomson
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 11/20/2017 08:24 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> Is this better cast as "sub" problems, or just "additional" problems? > > I think "additional" is the wrong semantic, because it implies that the > first error is hoisted

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-21 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 11/21/2017 11:48 AM, Niklas Keller wrote: > How about "causes"? I think this also implies more meaning than there really is. It also has the unfortunate property of being both a plural noun and a transitive verb, which could be confusing. Is there a problem with sub-problems?

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-21 Thread Niklas Keller
2017-11-21 19:55 GMT+01:00 Jacob Hoffman-Andrews : > On 11/20/2017 08:24 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > > Is this better cast as "sub" problems, or just "additional" problems? > > I think "additional" is the wrong semantic, because it implies that the > first error is hoisted to the

Re: [Acme] Returning multiple errors

2017-11-21 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 11/20/2017 08:24 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > Is this better cast as "sub" problems, or just "additional" problems? I think "additional" is the wrong semantic, because it implies that the first error is hoisted to the top position, so a naive client would only show the first error. Instead,