On Tue, Dec 25, 2018, at 07:32, Eric Rescorla wrote: > IMPORTANT > S 3. > > used to refer to fully qualified domain names. If a ACME server > > wishes to request proof that a user controls a IPv4 or IPv6 address > > it MUST create an authorization with the identifier type "ip". The > > value field of the identifier MUST contain the textual form of the > > address as defined in [RFC1123] Section 2.1 for IPv4 and in [RFC4291] > > Section 2.2 for IPv6. > > Are all three variants here valid?
I think that now is a good moment to mention RFC 5952. I suspect that most implementations use something other than a canonical representation, and probably accept all valid formats, but maybe now is the time to tighten that down. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
