[Acme] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-08

Reviewer: Sean Turner Review result: Ready with Issues Hi! 2nd ARTART review so I am not sure I am yet attuned to all the ART hot buttons. Drawing on the times I have been through the ARTART process as an I-D author ;) ADs NOTE: I picked "Ready with Issues" because, while my comments seem long,

[Acme] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Not Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors. Document editors and WG

[Acme] [IANA #1217629] Expert Review for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07 (acme)

Dear Richard, (cc to the acme WG) As the designated expert for the ACME Identifier Types registry and the ACME Validation Methods registry, can you review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07 for us? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ If these

[Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07

Reviewer: Valery Smyslov Review result: Has Issues I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07 issue

All, It appears that there is a logical issue in the current Node ID Validation draft [1]; I had incorrectly assumed that the current three inputs of the Key Authorization (token-chal, token-bundle, client account key thumbprint) provide proof of access to both the validated BP channel and the

Re: [Acme] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-07

Pete, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-3-15, at 22:06, Pete Resnick via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

[Acme] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-08: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [Acme] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07

Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Authors, would you please respond to Linda's questions/suggestions? Thanks, Lars > On 2021-11-4, at 5:19, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with

[Acme] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

[Acme] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer