> Between these two options, I would be more attracted to the latter. It's
> always been a bit of a sore point that the request URI was not covered by the
> client's signature, but to avoid the complexity of URL comparison, we did the
> "resource" thing instead. But maybe it makes sense to
Will you or your co-authors be in Buenos Aires for
> the IETF? Would you like to present this work to the working group there, if
> so?
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Karthik Bhargavan
> <karthikeyan.bharga...@inria.fr <mailto
Dear All,
Recently, after being asked by Josh Aas, I wrote a formal model of the ACME
protocol
in ProVerif and analyzed it for various properties. I am still in the process
of cleaning
up the model and writing up a proper report, but with the next IETF being so
close,
here’re some early
