Re: [Acme] Just the technical comments (was: ACME draft is now in WGLC.)

Yes, many of these things were already addressed by Jacob and others. On 7 March 2017 at 05:32, Richard Barnes wrote: >> S6.3.2 >> >>[...] and MUST reflect [the?] value of the >>"external-account-binding" field in the resulting account object >> >> Is this a direct copy of

[Acme] Just the technical comments (was: ACME draft is now in WGLC.)

At Rich's request, here are the technical parts. I assume that the editors will be trawling through the entirety of the original mail (for which I apologize). These are just the headline items, I pulled two forward because I think they are more important. The others are small beans. Of course