On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:33 AM Richard Barnes wrote:
>> Alternatively, would it make sense to define a new HTTP verb, e.g., “FETCH”,
>> for this?
>
> I'm inclined not to do this. We definitely shouldn't actually mint a new
> HTTP method, since we're not changing the method.
One does not
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:44 PM Felipe Gasper
wrote:
> FWIW, it seems to me like, if the HTTP verb being used is, in fact,
> “POST”, then a more appropriate term for the proposed fix for the identity
> correlation problem identified last week would be “GET-as-POST” rather than
> “POST-as-GET”.
>
FWIW, it seems to me like, if the HTTP verb being used is, in fact, “POST”,
then a more appropriate term for the proposed fix for the identity correlation
problem identified last week would be “GET-as-POST” rather than “POST-as-GET”.
“POST-as-GET” sounds to me like the actual HTTP verb is a
