Re: [Acme] Comments on ACME draft

2018-04-12 Thread Daniel McCarney
I think #420 is a good addition and is worth merging once Martin Thomson's review feedback is addressed. Thanks Richard, Tim. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > I agree, these seem worth merging. > > On 04/11/2018 01:56 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > >

Re: [Acme] Comments on ACME draft

2018-04-11 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
I agree, these seem worth merging. On 04/11/2018 01:56 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Here's a quick PR implementing Tim's proposed changes. > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/420 > > Personally, these seem fine to me.  I would be in favor of merging the PR. > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at

Re: [Acme] Comments on ACME draft

2018-04-11 Thread Richard Barnes
Here's a quick PR implementing Tim's proposed changes. https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/420 Personally, these seem fine to me. I would be in favor of merging the PR. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Tim Hollebeek wrote: > > I think the draft is in very