http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 22:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=7217)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7217&action=view)
lspci -vv with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=n and acpi=off on boot.
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 21:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=7215)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7215&action=view)
Full dmesg with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=n and acpi=off on boot.
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 22:24 ---
Pressing power button without acpid increments IRQ counter by 1 each time on
CPU0 in /proc/interrupts.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 22:11 ---
As requested, I uploaded some logs from kernel compiled without CONFIG_PCI_MSI,
with acpi=off boot parameter and without nvidia module. I also have the same set
of logs/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5987
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 22:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=7216)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7216&action=view)
/proc/interrupts with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=n and acpi=off on boot.
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5082
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 20:43 ---
I looked around speedstep-smi.c but didn't find an obvious place to
call acpi_processor_notify_smm(), since the speedstep-smi.c and
speedstep-centrino.c modules are so d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5966
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7188 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5082
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 18:05 ---
There is a acpi_processor_notify_smm() i drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c that
does exactly this. Other drivers like speedstep-centrino use it.
Not sure whether speedst
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 11:52 ---
Keep it open for now - we do workarounds for common BIOS bugs
(and I know these lost ticks happen on various machines)
Also I would like to understand what your change
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 11:40 ---
Rahul, the MSR you mentioned is c001_0055h, right?
Its value (read through /dev/cpu/0/msr) is
0x33300b0, which means that on a pending interrupt
the processor will write
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 09:23 ---
I'm using 2.6.16-rc1 patched with acpi-release-20060113-2.6.16-rc1.diff
With vanilla 2.6.15 (i.e. no extra acpi release patch), sleeping never hangs.
Once in a while (
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 09:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=7203)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7203&action=view)
log file showing 1st (ok) and 2nd (failed) sleep attempts
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
Summary: S3 sleep hangs the second time
Kernel Version: 2.6.16-rc1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Submitter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most recent kernel where this bug did n
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 09:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=7204)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7204&action=view)
S3 sleep script
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5864
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- You are receiving thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5065
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 07:18 ---
Maybe this is a different bug. Did you change anything in your .config ? Maybe
you should close this bug.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5065
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are rece
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 06:42 ---
Hello, thanks, it works with 2.6.16-rc1. Regards, Martin
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching som
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 04:27 ---
the values from sensors make sense to me as far as TEMP and FANS
are concerned - and they are what i wanted to know. the meaning of
the voltages and all the "inXXX" are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 04:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=7202)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7202&action=view)
cpuinfo
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 03:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=7201)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7201&action=view)
hardware info
attaching what i was able to dig out in M$ Win about
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 04:17 ---
The VRM table used by this family of CPU is actually not yet supported, I'll
work on it. It doesn't matter much here anyway as the VID pins of the chip
appear not to b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 04:02 ---
This ain't no misdetection for sure.
Do the values from the lm85 driver (as displayed by "sensors") make sense to
you? They sure don't make much sense to me (which is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 03:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=7200)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7200&action=view)
requested dump
unloading lm85 is not needed i think - the only thin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 01:43 ---
No binary attachemenr next time please. If there are too many files for
individual attachements, just concatenate them into a single, larger text file.
What strikes me
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 00:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=7199)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7199&action=view)
Max level Debug
Max level Debug on first Warning
--- You are r
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-01 00:33 ---
This patch does not work for me.
Here is the result. I have boot with i8042.debug
PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports directly.
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: 2
27 matches
Mail list logo
