http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9684
Summary: ACPI: fix acpi fan state set error
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2,6.24-rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9684
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=14274)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14274action=view)
Fix acpi fan state set error
This patch fixed this bug, please consider to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=14275)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14275action=view)
Try the customed DSDT
Hi, Giovanni
Will you please try the customed DSDT
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 00:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=14276)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14276action=view)
Try the customed DSDT
Hi, Fabien
Will you please try the customed DSDT
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #25 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9277
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 03:06 ---
I can confirm that this patch fixes the flicker problem with
gnome-power-manager. Remaining issues are most likely caused by duplicate video
device issue, described in bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 02:39 ---
sorry, I was wrong before. It doesn't work with RFKILL disabled. I didn't test
it in the range of my AP, that's why it worked I guess (btw, the range of
rt2500pci is poor, sth
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 04:20 ---
I am lost about using a custom DSDT.
I am on Debian testing with vanilla 2.6.23.12.
My steps:
- Compiled DSDT with iasl -tc
- Patched vanilla with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 06:10 ---
The patch from comment #13 fixes the issue for me. Without haldaemon and g-p-m
running, I can switch through 8 values of brightness, as under windows. There
is only one device
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9614
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 06:21 ---
The quirk does not change anything here. Looks like a bug in
gnome-power-manager then - the two lowest values are reported by
/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness as 10.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9625
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 07:11 ---
ThinkPad ACPI backlight mode means the firmware doesn't poke the hardware at
all when the user presses brightness up/down hot keys.
Instead, it just sends the 0x86 and 0x87
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Fedora ACPI meta-bug.
Alias: FCMETA_ACPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165150
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it
via _BCM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427518
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 09:13 ---
Another thing that might be interesting: the following debug messages are
printed when loading the acpi_cpufreq module the second time (i.e. when it
works).
Jan 4 18:09:07
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 08:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=14281)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14281action=view)
dmesg with custom DSDT for debugging
Ok it took me some time but here is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=14284)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14284action=view)
dmidecode output
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Megaraid driver resets indefinitly unless acpi=off
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151396
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 11:35 ---
Is there anything in the logs about the resume?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 11:47 ---
yes, now that you say it:
Jan 4 11:17:10 jan Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -191677227 ns)
Jan 4 11:17:14 jan WARNING: at net/mac80211/rx.c:1486 __ieee80211_rx()
Jan 4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 do not wake up after suspend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14284|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 14:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=14285)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14285action=view)
Move data into 4-byte aligned memory addresss
Hmm that means RX has
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9485
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 14:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=14286)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14286action=view)
acpidump (kernel 2.6.24-rc6; Abit IC7-G)
~ # cat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:01 ---
nope, nothing.
with your latest move-data-into-4-byte..patch even the above warning and oops
disappeared.
it's not only that my display is black, keyboard isn't working
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9485
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:03 ---
active[0] is the temperature where the fan starts spinning at full speed once
exceeded; at the moment the fan is set to 60% speed (FanEQ). No dmesg spam so
far.
Now I am
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 15:59 ---
OK, if somebody volunteers to test them, I'll write some test patches.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Fedora ACPI meta-bug.
Alias: FCMETA_ACPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165150
Bug 165150 depends on bug 312981, which changed state.
Bug 312981
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel 2.6.23-0.214.rc8.git2.fc8 b44 module suspend issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312981
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #126 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 19:30 ---
Nope, not yet, but monitor the BIOS update site as they may not tell me right
away if/when they post a fixed version
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #127 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 20:37 ---
I just noticed that the 1.11 version of the BIOS is available. On the Lenovo
web site, the Driver Matrix page for the X61/X61s claims the latest BIOS
version is 1.10, but if
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|s2ram regression|rt2x00: no wakeup from S3
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5809
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-04 22:12 ---
can you add some timing detail to that?
ie. does the button/lid even happen immediately
upon hitting the lid switch? (i expect yes).
And it looks like the state file catches
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|/proc/acpi/battery displays |/proc/acpi/battery displays
37 matches
Mail list logo
