http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12401
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #13 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12723
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rui.zh...@intel.com |
Status|ASSIGNED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12723
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_b...@kernel- |rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12723
--- Comment #15 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-23 23:17 ---
what about the other ACPI drivers?
can the bug be reproduced if CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT is cleared?
if it's still reproducible, please try again with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS cleare
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||len.br...@intel.com
--- Comme
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Power-Fan |Hibernation/Suspend
Produc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #44 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-23 21:44 ---
Hi, Romano
thanks for the acpidump.
From the acpidump it seems that there is no ACPI fan device("PNP0C0B"). And
the fan device is not controlled by toshiba_acpi drive
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
--- Comment #26 from mjg59-ker...@srcf.ucam.org 2009-02-23 20:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=20344)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20344&action=view)
Reserve low 64K on HPs
And this is the less-invasive patch that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
mjg59-ker...@srcf.ucam.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjg59-ker...@srcf.ucam.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
--- Comment #25 from mjg59-ker...@srcf.ucam.org 2009-02-23 19:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=20343)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20343&action=view)
KMS-dependent patch for issue
This appears to fix the problem o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|oops when closing laptop lid|oops when closing laptop lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12723
--- Comment #14 from len.br...@intel.com 2009-02-23 19:05 ---
also, possibly unrelated
> FADT: X_PM1a_EVT_BLK.bit_width (16) does not match PM1_EVT_LEN (4)
fcea94b
(ACPI: fix FADT parsing)
which added this warning, possibly in err
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12723
--- Comment #13 from len.br...@intel.com 2009-02-23 18:48 ---
> ACPI Warning (tbutils-0242): Incorrect checksum in table [_HPT] - 1C, should
> be 02 [20081204]
maybe unrelated, maybe not...
Please attach the output from acpidump
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_acpica-c...@kernel-|len.br...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #5 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-02-23 17:33 ---
Well, I have a patchset here that seems to fix it. But as far as I can test,
nothing turns the resources off later (might be USB braindamage, I don't know
if other PCI device dri
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12641
--- Comment #13 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-23 17:33 ---
well.
there is no ACPI interrupt when un/plugging the AC adapter,
so surely we can not get an ACPI event.
and it seems that this is what it's designed to be.
I guess you can
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12328
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fengguang...@intel.com
--- Co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12757
--- Comment #1 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-23 17:37 ---
Hi, David
Will you please attach the output of acpidump, lspci -vxxx?
It will be great if you can attach the output of dmesg when the following
boot option is added:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12700
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-...@kernel- |yakui.z...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11093
--- Comment #19 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2009-02-23 15:30
---
The fujitsu-laptop driver implements its specific brightness control via the
FUJ02B1 device. If this device is not present in a given laptop fujitsu-laptop
won'
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12758
Summary: ACPI exception with 2.6.29-rc6
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.29-rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Sever
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12757
Summary: >2.6.27 dies at cardbus init on laptop
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
S
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12723
--- Comment #12 from dmwilli...@shaw.ca 2009-02-23 13:27 ---
For what it is worth - calling cpufreq-info and cpufreq-set from konsole does
not generate any errors.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12328
--- Comment #5 from gi1...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-23 12:09 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> problem can be solved by an IGD Operegion fix.
> patch will be attached later.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1125
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12641
--- Comment #12 from a...@piggz.co.uk 2009-02-23 10:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=20329)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20329&action=view)
contents of /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/* with power not plugged in
its
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12641
--- Comment #11 from a...@piggz.co.uk 2009-02-23 10:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=20328)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20328&action=view)
contents of /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/* with power plugged in
--
Co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #43 from dieg...@teleline.es 2009-02-23 06:51 ---
I've tried 2.6.25 - no luck :(
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10932
--- Comment #30 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-02-23 05:48 ---
Yes, I do...
It looks like EC interrupt or polling mode is losing events. ThinkPad ECs seem
to have an internal queue (because part of the GPE process is done in SMI,
ARGH!), i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #4 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-02-23 03:49 ---
When the underlying issue gets fixed, commit
ff24ba74b6d3befbfbafa142582211b5a6095d45 has to be reverted, as it is bogus.
The reason the USB ports on *any* ThinkPad would be disa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #2 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-02-23 03:37 ---
It is a bit more basic. The resources are not being attached to all devices
properly, and because of that, someone decided to break things further to avoid
shutting down devices
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #3 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-02-23 03:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=20326)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20326&action=view)
acpidump of ThinkPad T43 model 2687 (BIOS 1Y), v 1.29
--
Configure bugmai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #151 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-23 02:56
---
@David: as you said, that operation resets the X keyboard driver. But the
problem is still at the hardware/kernel level since it is not normal to have to
reset
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #43 from romano.gianne...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 01:20 ---
After a STR cycle, the fans are working again. So the only thing needed is
doing a STR cycle after the STD one...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #42 from romano.gianne...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 01:17 ---
Tested. Still no fan after resume form hibernation in 2.6.29-rc5. Temperature
reached 75C without any fan triggering.
Trying to STR now...
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12106
--- Comment #59 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-23 01:14 ---
ping Mike.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12328
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
--- Comment #24 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-23 01:13 ---
*** Bug 12328 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12302
--- Comment #12 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-23 01:13 ---
Hi, Rui
From the comment #10 it seems that this issue is already fixed in the
latest kernel.
How about close this bug?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11093
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12706
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12328
--- Comment #3 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-23 01:03 ---
Hi, Rui
How about this bug? It seems that this is a duplicated of bug 12106.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #41 from romano.gianne...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 01:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=20325)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20325&action=view)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/user
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169
--- Comment #40 from romano.gianne...@gmail.com 2009-02-23 01:02 ---
Yes. It happened again. I didn't test it more (I use really rarely hibernation,
STR is much more useful and fast), but if you want I can test it. I will attach
acpidump
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11093
--- Comment #18 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-23 00:43 ---
Hi, Jonathan & Rui
From the acpidump it seems that there is no following ACPI object:
> FUJ02BF/FUJ02B1/FUJ02E3
In such case the fujitsu-laptop driver can't work
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11093
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #17 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
Assigned
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12641
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #10 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12684
--- Comment #8 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-23 00:26 ---
ping adam
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12706
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_ot...@kernel- |rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11093
--- Comment #16 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-23 00:21 ---
Hi, Carlos
Sorry for the late response.
What Rui said in comment #14 is correct. There exist the ACPI objects of
_BCL/_BCM. But unfortunately the _BCM is the bogus
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12706
--- Comment #5 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-02-23 00:13 ---
Yes, I can reproduce this problem.
this is a regression, as invoking INIT method causes 15+ seconds in 2.6.29,
which used to be 1s.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ke
53 matches
Mail list logo
