http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #35 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 21:27 ---
Disregard the first line in attachment #19021. The tests were not done with
2.6.27.5.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 21:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=19021)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19021&action=view)
Tests with 2.6.28-rc6 from git
Sorry for the long delay. I finally pull
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 22:37 ---
hah, any update?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 20:16 ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> 1. kill acpid, run "cat /proc/acpi/event" ...
Sorry, no output from /proc/acpi/event with acpid killed.
> 2. pull linus' git tree ...
This will
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 17:50 ---
excellent tests and valuable info. You make my work much easier, Marc. :)
The problem is caused by some wrong interactions between ACPI and some user
applications, maybe X.
so
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 08:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=18850)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18850&action=view)
Various commands that show the brightness file levels w/ 2.6.27.5
Hello
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 23:17 ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > > 23:19 - I go to console using Ctrl-Alt-F1. The actual brightness goes to
> > > 100%.
> > this is strange, this is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 20:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=18839)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18839&action=view)
Output of "xrandr --verbose"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 20:07 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Hi, Marc,
> you don't need to do the test in comment #22.
Too late :)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > 23:15 - Boot. Brightness goes up to 100%
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 18:45 ---
Hi, Marc,
you don't need to do the test in comment #22.
(In reply to comment #21)
> 23:15 - Boot. Brightness goes up to 100%
good, the ACPI video driver set the brightness le
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=18836)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18836&action=view)
commands and output for test in comment 22
--
Configure bugmail: http:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 16:01 ---
Hello Zhang,
In response to comment 22 : after every step in the test I did, I used "cat" to
view the contents of the /proc and the 2 /sys brightness files.
There is debug ou
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Other |Power-Video
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|LCD brightness constantly |LCD brightness constantly
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 23:28 ---
Hi, Marc, nice bug report. :)
one question, at 23:17, how did you know /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness
has the correct value, and acpi_video0, acpi_video1 still say level 7
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 20:34 ---
23:15 - Boot. Brightness goes up to 100%
23:17 - echo 62 > /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCD/brightness. The actual brightness
changes, and that file has the correct value, but both b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-11 20:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=18813)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18813&action=view)
Dmesg for patch from comment #19
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18795|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 23:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=18795)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18795&action=view)
debug patch
please apply this patch on the latest kernel source,
redo th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 22:37 ---
Hello,
Sorry for taking so long. I discovered that I cannot easily revert to an older
kernel, so I had to install a 2nd copy of linux on a temporary partition.
Anyway, here a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-29 23:56 ---
Hi, Marc
Will you please apply the patch in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10206#C13 on the 2.6.26.6 kernel and
see whether the issue still exists?
thanks.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-29 22:57 ---
I have now booted with the acpi_osi argument.
- At boot time, the brightness level did not get set to 100%. It remained at
the level I want (62%).
- The brightness files in /s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-29 22:19 ---
Test 1 done with 2.6.27.3 and acpid killed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /proc/acpi/event
video DD04 0086
video DD04 0086
video DD04 0087
video
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #13 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-25 12:14 ---
Here is my test with 2.6.26.6
1) Before rebooting into 2.6.26.6, I set the brightness to 62%, my preferred
level.
2) After booting into 2.6.26.6, the brightness level does NO
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 19:04 ---
Hi, Marc
Will you please do the test as mentioned in comment #7 on the 2.6.26.6
kernel and confirm whether the brightness returned by /proc/acpi/. is
consistent with the re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-22 13:27 ---
I upgraded xf86-video-intel to version 2.5.0, and there is no change.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-22 01:25 ---
I have intel driver 2.3.2, but the problems occur outside of xorg, too.
I think that in the absence of the _BQC object, if there is no way of reading
the current brightness lev
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-21 23:29 ---
did you try latest intel x-windows gfx driver?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-20 15:05 ---
Hello,
I can confirm that _BQC is always = 0. I added some printk() calls to a test
kernel last week.
The process that reads /proc/acpi/event is acpid. I rebooted with all da
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-20 13:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=18385)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18385&action=view)
The output of acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-20 01:35 ---
Please use the command of "lsof /proc/acpi/event" to get the process which is
using the /proc/acpi/event.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpref
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 15:42 ---
Reverting the following patch has made the brightness changes go away:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=c2c789057f075022658b38b498
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11769
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-15 12:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=18327)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18327&action=view)
Kernel 2.6.27 .config file
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel
42 matches
Mail list logo
