http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #21 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-05 20:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=13882)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13882action=view)
patch from comment #20 backported to linux-2.6.16, 2.6.17
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-05 20:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=13883)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13883action=view)
patch from comment #20 backported to linux-2.6.18, 2.6.19, 2.6.20
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-02 11:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=13831)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13831action=view)
patch vs 2.6.24-rc3
verified that this patch, cherry-picked from the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-26 14:38 ---
Verified failure on 20070919, works correctly on 20071019:
- ex _psd
Executing \_PSD
Execution of \_PSD returned object 00327E40 Buflen 70
[Package] Contains 1 Elements:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-24 06:03 ---
I do see few examples in ACPI spec which has
Return (Package(x)) {}
syntax. That must be valid. Isn't it?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-23 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=13705)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13705action=view)
console log 2.6.24+ w/o ACPI tracing debugging
enabled all debug flags at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13705|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-23 09:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=13719)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13719action=view)
CPU1IST.dat
$ acpidump -a 0x7DFB0720 -l 0x0359 CPU1IST.dat
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-23 09:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=13718)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13718action=view)
CPU0IST.dat
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|m
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-22 00:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13690)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13690action=view)
console log 2.6.24-rc3+ 64-bit
Yes, 64-bit mode fails too. Attached is a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-22 23:34 ---
The 93,414th call to acpi_ns_get_parent_node() caused the crash.
It was passed a namespace node...
at address 81007d8544c8.
node-name
node-flags 6b
node-peer
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13674)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13674action=view)
console log 2.6.24-rc3+ w/ CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=n
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13675)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13675action=view)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:13 ---
typo: comment #1 is 2.6.24-rc3+, not .23-rc3+
The system under test is a Weybridge SDV with a dual core processor.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 16:32 ---
Len,
Can you attach your config.
Also, do yo see the problem with 64 bit kernel as well?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 17:02 ---
0x6b is POISON_FREE. SLAB and SLUB debug sets the freed area to 0x6b. But,
somewhere in the linked list there is still an active pointer to some freed
area which we try to
21 matches
Mail list logo
