http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 01:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=10774)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10774&action=view)
2.6.21-rc3 patch to revert ACPICA acpi_serialize changes
Please t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8192
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8195
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 01:32 ---
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 18:15 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> no indication this is related to ACPI itself,
> throwing it over the wall timers sub-system.
>
> I expect
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 05:04 ---
well , it is working great now , ooops , not great 'cause you told me
acpi_serialize is just a workaround :), let`s say that the workaround is working
great :D . Thank
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8186
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 05:18 ---
Tried 2.6.16.46 stable and 2.6.18.8 stable - both got kernel panics because
switchroot failed before trying init - probably because my root directory is
RAID1 LVM - I'm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 06:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=10775)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10775&action=view)
dmesg on a 2.6.18.8 kernel
We have been running 2.6.18.x kernel s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.17.11 |2.6.18.8
--- Additional Comments F
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8190
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments F
The reboot,and shutdown issue seems be resloved on my install of feisty.
tested on a biostar t-force 6100 939.
On 3/14/07, intxxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i just did a bios upgrade on my intel s5000psl board
> and reboot works now.
>
> BIOS: R0074
> BMC: 58
> FRUSDR:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10771|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10765|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10766|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10767|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8190
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 10:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=10780)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10780&action=view)
dmesg with mdelay(4)
The minimal value for mdelay is 4.
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 10:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=10781)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10781&action=view)
Enable runtime GPEs
Please check if this patch removes AE_TIME ex
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8190
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=10782)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10782&action=view)
dmesg output after S3 suspend with enable runtime gpes patch appli
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:30 ---
hm, could you try to increase ACPI_EC_DELAY to 5000 in drivers/acpi/ec.c?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or ar
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=10783)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10783&action=view)
Just before kernel crash
This is just before the kernel crash.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=10784)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10784&action=view)
Actual kernel diump trace
This is the actual kernel dump trace.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=10785)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10785&action=view)
Just before crash with apci=off option
Just before the kernel apc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=10786)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10786&action=view)
First part of the kernel trace
First part of kernel apci=off trac
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 12:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=10787)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10787&action=view)
Final part of the kernel trace.
Final part of the kernel apci=off
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 13:02 ---
All the pictures I've just uploaded are from a Fedor Core 6 install DVD. There
are two trace, the first is from the default kernel, the second from booting
with "linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 13:06 ---
Increasing ACPI_EC_DELAY to 5000 in drivers/acpi/ec.c does nothing to the error
and exceptions in dmesg after resuming from S3. However, the resume takes longer
Additio
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8075
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 13:33 ---
Is there a way to force the APCI processor module to load before the powernow_k8
module on your systems? The failure of the ACPI processor module to load is
what is cau
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8195
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 16:37 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8195
On Thursday 15 March 2007 1:39 am, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Also the hardware clock setting
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 22:36 ---
heh, yeah, we're back to where we started.
we still need to go figure out why it is necessary to
manually use "acpi_serialize" on this box in the first place.
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8210
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8199
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 22:43 ---
Could you please check if interrupt counter change _after_ resume? e.g. do
several samples of the counter while doing read of battery states/info
--- You are recei
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8110
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-16 00:32 ---
I wonder why the bug got closed although I haven't reported any success yet...
Anyway. I finally encountered the thousand-degrees-bug with 2.6.20 again. So my
strategy
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8171
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-16 00:50 ---
if there is anything else i can do to help in this , just ask :)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watchin
33 matches
Mail list logo
