http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #9
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 03:39 ---
> Also, are all three of these necessary, or does the system boot when using
> just acpi=off?
All three are necessary.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/user
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9399
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 05:11 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> That's weird. :)
> Please attach the content of /proc/acpi/battery/bat0/*.
I tried... but I don't have a bat0/ directory... I do have /proc/acpi/bat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #99 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 05:15 ---
I have an X61s with the latest (1.08, 9/26/2007) BIOS and 2.6.24-rc3, and I'm
seeing exactly the same behavior. Disabling the bluetooth does make or
unloading the ehci_hcd modu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9314
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 07:07 ---
> --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-20 23:52 ---
> When using only "highres=off", I need to press keys on supend.
> After resume, I found the following BUG()
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 08:59 ---
>> are all three of these necessary?
> All three are necessary.
that is odd, on laptops, "noapic" is usually redundant with "acpi=off"
because the IOAPIC support is generally i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 10:16 ---
I upgraded the kernel to Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r2, applied the patch. The acpi
events are not repeated in the acpid logs.
Fixed? Any tests I should run?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
Summary: acpi-cpufreq boot crash
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.20-2.6.23-rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=13673)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13673&action=view)
console log 2.6.23-rc3+
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8288
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13674)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13674&action=view)
console log 2.6.24-rc3+ w/ CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=n
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13675)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13675&action=view)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 11:13 ---
typo: comment #1 is 2.6.24-rc3+, not .23-rc3+
The system under test is a Weybridge SDV with a dual core processor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 10:15 ---
Let's see, maybe we have mixed up something. We will meet this evening and try
the boot options that you and Yakui have written down.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ke
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264077#c18
Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 12:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=13677)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13677&action=view)
dmesg of acpi=ht irqpoll ide=nodma
We had some success using acpi=ht irqp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13568|pci=mmconf (sorry for bad |pci=nommconf (sorry for bad
desc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13569|pci=mmconf * acpi_osi=Linux |pci=nommconf +
description|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13570|pci=mmconf + pci=nodma |pci=nommconf + pci=nodma
descri
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEEDI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 12:58 ---
When using the "acpi=ht irqpoll ide=nodma", then the system freezes when using
the touchpad. USB devices (e.g. mouse) do not work.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kerne
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9000
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 13:50 ---
In the mean time I upgraded to OpenSuse 10.3, with kernel
2.6.22.12-0.1-default. No "/proc/acpi/alarm" and no
"sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm" on my system, so I should dive into
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #28 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 14:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=13680)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13680&action=view)
kernel .config
it's just the plain fedora 8 debug kernel, but i have atta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8298
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 14:49 ---
same here on an asus w7j.
first modprobe fails to provide cpufreq capability, usually only cpu1 is
affected.
second modprobe works.
dmesg excerpt:
ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8298
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 14:51 ---
$ uname -a
Linux w7j 2.6.23-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Nov 21 21:37:39 CET 2007 i686 Genuine
Intel(R) CPU T2400 @ 1.83GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8298
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 15:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=13683)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13683&action=view)
w7j acpidump
w7j acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|atkbd.c: Unknown key|atkbd.c: Unknown key
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9299
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9299
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 16:04 ---
Len, I hope this patch is going to Linus?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 16:32 ---
Len,
Can you attach your config.
Also, do yo see the problem with 64 bit kernel as well?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> But without the 'battery' module for example you cannot know how much power
> you
> have left...
>
Of course they are all useful. You can always l
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 17:02 ---
0x6b is POISON_FREE. SLAB and SLUB debug sets the freed area to 0x6b. But,
somewhere in the linked list there is still an active pointer to some freed
area which we try to acce
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9429
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 23:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=13689)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13689&action=view)
failing config-2.6.24-rc3+
here's a config that fails. disable SLAB debug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-21 23:31 ---
Yes, here it is:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/22/2
It is also a valid summary to the current bug situation.
I hope I have been clear and I hope that it will cause some more i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9299
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Component|Other
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9299
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9299
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
44 matches
Mail list logo