http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 00:02 ---
Interesting idea but somewhat unacceptable.
When running Linux I'd like to be ale to use all hardware on my board.
I contacted gigabyte over this matter via http://ggts.gigabyt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 00:14 ---
In all BIOS affected, the I/O port range(s) declared for the IT87xxF device are
plain wrong, and that's why the it87 driver fails loading. It doesn't have
anything to do with th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 00:38 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Created an attachment (id=14267)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14267&action=view) [details]
> it87 request only environment cont
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 00:58 ---
> There are many boards out there (probably the majority)
> where the I/O area of the hardware monitoring chip is
> declared in the BIOS but the BIOS doesn't make any use of it
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 01:07 ---
You could just try to disable call to _DOS -- this function will disable BIOS
control over brightness.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 01:21 ---
The Gigabyte F4a beta bios for M56S-S3 board does not fix the issue for a
2.6.23.11 kernel so I had to revert the patch I mentioned above again.
I again referenced Gigabyte supp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it
via _BCM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427518
--- Additional Comments F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it
via _BCM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427518
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 02:00 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> good, then maybe a DMI based BIOS workaround is viable.
> However, I agree with Bjorn that "pnpacpi=off" would
> be hitting this problem with too big
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 02:25 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> The Gigabyte F4a beta bios for M56S-S3 board does not fix the issue for a
> 2.6.23.11 kernel so I had to revert the patch I mentioned above again.
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 02:33 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> I fail to see how Windows monitoring applications would matter here. I have no
> idea how I/O resources are managed on Windows, if they are at all.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: ACPI video driver should validate brightness level before setting it
via _BCM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427518
--- Additional Comments F
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 04:55 ---
OK, but all, not only brightness control, fn keys stops working. What about
them?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14391|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7598
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 08:51 ---
I'm not getting a problem with 2.6.24-3 s part of Ubuntu Hardy Heron alpha 3.
Sadly the upgrade failed an I had to fresh install making debuging the previous
kernel sort of diff
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9624
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 10:28 ---
Ok, ACPI_THERMAL was not the problem. With ACPI_THERMAL disabled in config,
pulling the power would cause the system to reboot after about 4 seconds. This
was missed by my plug/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
--- Comment #71 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 12:15 ---
Anything else i could do to help in investigating the problem?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9740
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #72 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8737
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9740
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9740
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #9
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 15:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=14429)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14429&action=view)
patch vs 2.6.24-rc7 to limit warning printout to 1 line
commit 66a21736de
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2884
--- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 16:00 ---
The DSDT in comment #30 looks this way,
If (LEqual (\SCMP (\_OS, "Microsoft Windows"), Zero))
{
Store (0x01, \W98F) // Windows 98
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5289
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5373
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5374
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5390
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6305
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8238
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8833
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8493
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8779
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9127
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7218
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9486
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9588
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9663
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7857
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6933
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 16:29 ---
applied to acpi-test
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7099
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Component|Power-Process
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8269
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-12 16:39 ---
patch in comment #11 applied to acpi-test
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8385
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #57 from [EMA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
55 matches
Mail list logo