http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 00:01 ---
I'd certainly prefer #9916 unfixed over #10285.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15350|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 00:50 ---
Guillaume,
Thanks for the log, it shows interrupts coming at much higher rate than needed,
so
you too suffer from "interrupt storm" this patch is trying to fix (apparently
to s
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AssignedTo|[E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 01:31 ---
APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
gnu:~# uname -r
2.6.24.3-gnu
gnu:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 03:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=15353)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15353&action=view)
Debug Log around the ooops
When I tried to reproduce the ooops to get th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 04:58 ---
Do we all agree that Matthew's patch should get reactivated for 2.6.25?
This also is not a ThinkPad but IGD specific problem.
The problem with IGD is that we cannot determine w
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
Configure bugmail: http://b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 05:45 ---
No, it should be reverted for 2.6.25 - it causes a clear functional regression,
regardless of whether or not it worked by design or accident before.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 06:35 ---
Hmm, AFAIK even in the last RC fixing is preferred over reverting.
And patch from comment #30 fixes the issue.
If the patch is reverted, the driver should be marked experimenta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 06:45 ---
BTW, I explained this whole ThinkPad IGD problem with the ACPI video driver
more than 4 months ago:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10476.html
(Take the last pa
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6712
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 07:23 ---
this system is in production now... i can't experiment like i could
before. is there something 2.6.24 fixes which 2.6.24-rc5 doesn't?
thanks
-dean
--
Configure bugmail: ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: On boot up "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem resources"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436589
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 08:54 ---
(In reply to comment #50)
> Hmm, AFAIK even in the last RC fixing is preferred over reverting.
>...
That's wrong.
Fixing can introduce new regressions.
If reverting makes the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4773
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 09:42 ---
A newer version of this patch is already upstream:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=391df5dce30a5aab477b9e55ea65a3e83bae96b1
Joh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 11:10 ---
I can confirm this is still a problem on the SiS 661 at least as of 2.6.23.15
(which is the latest Fedora is pushing at the moment).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|9832|
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 13:37 ---
Note that the proposed fix has the side effect of eliminating the
possibly confusing "PCI: Cannot allocate resource region ..." messages
that show up during boot when the ThinkP
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 13:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=15357)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15357&action=view)
possible fix
Pavel/Paul,
Please give this a try and let me know what you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 13:41 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Note that the proposed fix has the side effect of eliminating the
> possibly confusing "PCI: Cannot allocate resource region ..." messages
> that sho
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 13:53 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
> You mean "this revert of 4af8e10a6c57e7292862bd1703712f0565c7e429"
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> > index 7222a1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9399
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 14:31 ---
I retried 2.6.24.3 and checked ec.c file, but it looks like the one in the
patch. Anyway, it's not working. I tried patch-2.6.25-rc6 but I get errors at
compile time. I will che
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-20 14:46 ---
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=n fixes it. This is how my bisect log looked like, but as rjw
mentioned, it is useless: It was in 2.6.24, too, but only with
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO set. Stupid me f
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of "ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)..." when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of "ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)..." when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: I cannot boot fedora after updating the kernel on a sony vaio
vgn-fe41z laptop.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432477
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9586
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10237
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_config-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-0
36 matches
Mail list logo
