http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 00:15 ---
Thanks for the info.
Will you please set CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG in kernel configuration and do the
following test? (button driver should be loaded).
a. kill the process who is using
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10389
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #9 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 00:45 ---
Peter,
please attach the full acpidump output
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 00:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=15884)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15884&action=view)
vist table
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10478
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|ASSI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 00:50 ---
any updates on this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10010
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 01:04 ---
Does it still happen if you override the value in /proc/acpi/wakeup?
run "echo +-00-00 00:00:20 > /proc/acpi/wakeup",
what do you see in /proc/acpi/wakeup?
you should recei
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 01:30 ---
Unfortunately there is no serial console. I will add some debug printk calls to
video.ko however. Do you think it's worth trying out netconsole?
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 01:30 ---
Oh, there are no messages at all when loading video.ko on the console so a
screenshot without additional debugging info won't be very useful :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10448
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 02:00 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Unfortunately there is no serial console. I will add some debug printk calls
> to
> video.ko however. Do you think it's worth trying out netconsole
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10483
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 04:02 ---
Note: I again tried 2.6.24 (once) and it seems it boots-up well, so the
regression is probably only in 2.6.25. I do not remember completely why I
didn't use 2.6.24, but it was m
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7060
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 07:13 ---
Thanks for indicating how to use the acpi debug stuff.
My crazy-sounding theory in comment 5 (which I swear worked about 10 times in a
row yesterday) just won't work anymore to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 07:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=15887)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15887&action=view)
kern_log_acpid1 - see comment 7
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.k
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 07:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=15886)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15886&action=view)
kern_log - see comment 7
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 07:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=15888)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15888&action=view)
kern_log_acpid2 - see comment 7
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 07:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=15889)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15889&action=view)
kern_log_acpid3 - see comment 7
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 09:28 ---
I went straight from 2.6.24.1 to 2.6.25 (so I never saw it fixed) which gives
me:
ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index (0FFFC) is
beyond end of objec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 09:34 ---
I'm sorry for being really slow with this, a lot of real life things have taken
up my time lately, and I've only had sporadic internet access. I'll attach the
output of acpidump
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 09:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=15892)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15892&action=view)
output of acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/use
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 09:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=15893)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15893&action=view)
output of lspci -vvv
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10454
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 16:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=15903)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15903&action=view)
acpidump -o acpi.dump
complete acpi dump
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 19:19 ---
Thanks for the test.
What you said in comment #7 is correct. I want to confirm whether there exist
the PWRF and SLPB event after the system is resumed. IMO that the system
susp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10010
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 19:35 ---
sh-3.1# cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
Device S-state Status Sysfs node
USB1 S3 disabled pci::00:1d.0
USB2 S3 disabled pci::00:1d.1
USB3 S3 dis
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 19:41 ---
Will do.
Just for clarity, should anything other than the ev_fixed_event_detect and
ev_gpe_detect lines to be logged when an power button event shows up on
/proc/acpi/event ?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10509
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-24 19:52 ---
When the power button event shows up in /proc/acpi/event, the info of
"ev_fixed_event_detect and ev_gpe_detect" should appear. Of course sometimes
there will be some other info
27 matches
Mail list logo
