http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10510
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 05:29 ---
I run a few more tests and made sure that I didn't use the Debian scripts, but
put the system to sleep by hand (echo mem /sys/power/sleep).
When I remove the battery module
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 05:29 ---
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 04:21 ---
When you use clocksource=acpi_pm then it works with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10510
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 05:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=15987)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15987action=view)
lspci -vvxx output
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 03:53 ---
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 03:31 ---
What happens when you boot with clocksource=hpet or clocksource=acpi_pm on
the
kernel command line
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10561
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 03:31 ---
What happens when you boot with clocksource=hpet or clocksource=acpi_pm on the
kernel command line ?
Whichever one I boot with is, indeed, used from early on in the boot
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6712
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #24 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5833
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 02:06 ---
It seesm like some memory allocation issue. This bug is hard to reproduce with
suspend after freh start.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 02:05 ---
i can't find exact commit without 100% killer aplication. I can't reproduce one
crash 2 times, but every time will crash some thing other. Today i tryed to
kill firefox or gcc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 01:43 ---
does the problem still exist if X is not started?
And it would be great if you can find the exact commit that cause this problem
using git bisect.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10503
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 01:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=15983)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15983action=view)
patch: disable pme
please apply this patch and see if it works for you.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 01:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=15982)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15982action=view)
dmesg output with acpi_osi=!Windows_2006
Regarding the settable brightness
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: acpid needs a reasonable default setup (use apmscript?)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: cpuspeed service does not start with kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444726
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 11:58 ---
if you can remove any redundant hardware, please remove it so that you run bare
minimum configuration
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10482
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10482
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10482
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #11 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10394
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 13:53 ---
Sorry about the delayed response on this one. I have finally figured out the
reason for this oops. I should have a patch for you to test soon.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10394
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167
--- Comment #81 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 14:27 ---
Can someone explain to me how with the Comment #80 attachment why this can not
be fixed in the kernel? It appears we know the problem and the fix.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6217
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9487
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 20:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=15993)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15993action=view)
patch included in linux-2.6.25-rc16
The attached patch shipped in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 20:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=15994)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15994action=view)
patch included in linux-2.6.25-git16
the attached patch shipped in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-30 21:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=15995)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15995action=view)
patch included in linux-2.6.25-git16
shipped in linux-2.6.25-git16
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279
Bug 10279 depends on bug 9998, which changed state.
Bug 9998 Summary: SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
What|Old Value |New Value
36 matches
Mail list logo
