http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16364|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-10 07:02 ---
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:54 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
> What|Removed
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6001
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-10 13:46 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> weird. I don't think there is any change in Linux on this.
> hmm, what do you see when "cat /proc/acpi/video/*/DOS"?
>
hmm, my bug had marked has d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-10 14:15 ---
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Justin Mattock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:54 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-10 14:30 ---
Justin,
battery and AC drivers are read-only to HW. They do not change the state of HW
in any way, thus it is not very critical to allow them being "broken" or
oddly-behaving.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-10 16:49 ---
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:30 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #26 from [
