[Bug 65601] Lenovo T440s backlight step too large on kernel v3.13 with intel_backlight

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65601 Aaron Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|acpi_power-video@kernel-bug |aaron...@intel.com |s.osdl.o

[Bug 65601] Lenovo T440s backlight step too large on kernel v3.13 with intel_backlight

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65601 --- Comment #32 from Aaron Lu --- Sorry for replying back. Please boot into console mode and then enable backlight debug message by: # cd /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug # echo 'module backlight +pfmt' > control After this, remove/attach power cor

[Bug 12878] [regression after 2.6.18] resume failure - MSI PR200WX-058EU

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878 --- Comment #124 from Alan --- It's still present. Please try and find which kernel version your laptop fails at again. Probably some other bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 12878] [regression after 2.6.18] resume failure - MSI PR200WX-058EU

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878 --- Comment #125 from tadzi...@gmail.com --- 3.12-1-amd64. it is debian jessie default kernel in main branch. yesterday i've recompiled 3.12 kernel with applied patch provided here by Ondriej Zary and hibernation works again. and i've copied .co

[Bug 12878] [regression after 2.6.18] resume failure - MSI PR200WX-058EU

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878 --- Comment #126 from Ondrej Zary --- The patch attached to this bug report is old version and completely different from the patch present in upstream kernel: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ad68652412276f

[Bug 12878] [regression after 2.6.18] resume failure - MSI PR200WX-058EU

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878 --- Comment #127 from tadzi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Ondrej Zary from comment #126) > The patch attached to this bug report is old version and completely > different from the patch present in upstream kernel: yes i know. to clear some things

[Bug 68591] Regression: Asrock M3A UCC does not boot without acpi=off or pci=noacpi

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68591 --- Comment #10 from Bjorn Helgaas --- Thanks for the report, Bodo. Can you attach a complete dmesg log of a recent kernel (the newer the better) booted with "pci=nocrs"? That should include information about the host bridge windows reported by

[Bug 44161] Samsung Series 9 np900x4b: ACPI does not seem to reflect charging/discharging status for the battery correctly.

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161 San changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@plusnet.pl --- Comment #124 from San --- Crea

[Bug 44161] Samsung Series 9 np900x4b: ACPI does not seem to reflect charging/discharging status for the battery correctly.

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161 Jason Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC|m...@jasonrobinson.me | -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug 69711] acpi_no_auto_ssdt bug or not ?

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69711 Lan Tianyu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tianyu@intel.com Assignee|acpi

[Bug 67771] Error in dmesg: Namespace lookup failure, Method parse/execution failed

2014-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67771 Zhang Rui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rui.zh...@intel.com Assignee|acpi_o