http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12270
--- Comment #60 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:45:16 ---
done.
patch already available at
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/16983/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13041
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13038
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_b...@kernel-bugs.osdl. |yakui.z...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002
--- Comment #6 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-08 01:33:52 ---
Sorry that I gave the incorrect boot option.
Will you please try the boot option of noapic and see whether the box can be
booted?
Please also attach the output of dmesg
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
--- Comment #11 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-08 02:28:26 ---
Hi, Piotr
From the acpidump we know that there is no _DOS object, which is required
for brightness control. In such case we have no generic ACPI backlight I/F.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20844|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #20 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-08 06:14:11
---
With which kernel? Unpatched, or one of the patches?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002
Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #21 from Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com 2009-04-08 06:35:39 ---
unpatched kernel please.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #22 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-08 07:13:24
---
Does not help. Maybe forgot a parameter?
126:[0.00] Kernel command line:
root=UUID=4349ad91-9018-4e72-817b-46624e9a6c27 ro quiet splash fastboot
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #23 from Shaohua shaohua...@intel.com 2009-04-08 07:22:25 ---
sorry, it should be libata.noacpi=1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #25 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-08 07:47:24
---
#23: No, doesn't help at all. Behavior is the same as without the parameter.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #26 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-08 07:49:34
---
Created an attachment (id=20879)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20879)
lspci normal boot
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #31 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-08 08:00:25 ---
Hi
Sorry for the late response.
Will you please attach the output of dmesg, lspci -vxxx, lsusb -l?
From the test result it seems that the issue can be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023
--- Comment #13 from Piotr W. Abramov piotr.ab...@gmail.com 2009-04-08
08:12:35 ---
As a workaround I wrote the driver which invoked _BCM method and created the
backlight interface.
But the problem with the hotkeys still persists (no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #27 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-08 08:17:57
---
Created an attachment (id=20881)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20881)
lspci fastboot -vvxxx
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #28 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-08 08:28:15
---
Created an attachment (id=20882)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20882)
lspci diff -C10 normal fastboot
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20879|0 |1
is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036
--- Comment #9 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com
2009-04-08 08:36:12 ---
i think the patch works also on my sony vaio sr 19xn.
at the time i did not have that message any more.
instead i got:
ACPI: EC: missing
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7236
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #24 from Kenney Phillis Jr. kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-04-08
15:10:52 ---
Yes, most of the special hotkeys work... only 1 or 2 didn't, but those where
not working to begin with, and not really required. as for the hotkeys, they
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #32 from M. Vefa Bicakci bic...@superonline.com 2009-04-08
15:16:51 ---
Hello,
I will attach the output of dmesg, lspci -vxxx and lsusb -v in a moment.
I am using Sidux, and the lsusb I have on my system does not have a -l
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #33 from M. Vefa Bicakci bic...@superonline.com 2009-04-08
15:19:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=20885)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20885)
dmesg output for 2.6.29.1 with 99 as the spurious interrupt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #34 from M. Vefa Bicakci bic...@superonline.com 2009-04-08
15:21:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=20886)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20886)
Output of lspci -vxxx
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #35 from M. Vefa Bicakci bic...@superonline.com 2009-04-08
15:22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=20887)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20887)
Output of lsusb -v
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #36 from M. Vefa Bicakci bic...@superonline.com 2009-04-08
15:24:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=20888)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20888)
The patch that makes the kernel print out the name of the handler
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #37 from M. Vefa Bicakci bic...@superonline.com 2009-04-08
15:25:37 ---
The patch I attached a few seconds ago also changes the spurious
interrupt threshold to 10. However, the kernel I am currently using
has a threshold of 99,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #10 from Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 19:45:29 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I don't see anything related to a memory/object overwrite issue
in that particular snapshot.
Couldn't this really be caused by some ACPI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #11 from Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 19:46:54 ---
And, I have not enough permissions to reopen the entry. Could anybody do that?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #12 from Robert Moore robert.mo...@intel.com 2009-04-08 20:04:52
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Couldn't this really be caused by some ACPI internal structures being
overwritten?
All I can say is that from the snapshot, it looks
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #13 from Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 20:09:59 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
it looks like the interpreter is executing normally.
Yes, I agree it behaves as expected.
Should I see those messages every time I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #14 from Jiri Slaby jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 20:32:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=20891)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20891)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6404
--- Comment #23 from Bill McGonigle bill-osdl.org-bugzi...@bfccomputing.com
2009-04-09 02:38:56 ---
If anybody wants to work on this and needs hardware, send me an e-mail. I'm
done with the machine so implicated here and can mail the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
Summary: /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/* is gone on vaio
laptop with Intel GM45.
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #1 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-09
05:01:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=20893)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20893)
lspci -vv
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #110 from Peter Klotz peter.kl...@aon.at 2009-04-09 06:35:16 ---
The final patch from comment #109 made it work perfectly!
Thanks a lot Zhang for all your efforts!
r...@asus:/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD# cat brightness
levels: 10
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
Peter Klotz peter.kl...@aon.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20850|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #112 from Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-04-09 08:04:09 ---
1. When will these patches go into mainline (I hope they will)?
Bad news is that all of them are going to upsteam except the last one.
Good news is that I can rewrite
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #30 from Dennis Jansen dennis.jan...@web.de 2009-04-09 11:16:39
---
Please remove the NEEDINFO tag as it's incorrect.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #4 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-09
13:01:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=20905)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20905)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #5 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-09
13:02:10 ---
I tried to load i915 (video module is loaded automatically) and with no
success.
And when I load the video module without i915, I have the same issue.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
--- Comment #12 from Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-04-09
13:05:50 ---
After changing kernel to tuxonice-sources from Gentoo (the same .config as with
zen and vanilla) the problem is not so dramatic and it reaches ~90 C only
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12816
Spencer Goh dymax...@spencergoh.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13053
Summary: No HPET interrupts unless acpi_skip_timer_override is
set.
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.28
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13053
--- Comment #1 from William Cattey w...@mit.edu 2009-04-09 23:31:21 ---
After posting this, I continued to investigate. I don't consider myself at all
clueful in the ways of the kernel, but I figured I should keep working and
learning.
I was
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #7 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-10 02:08:35 ---
Hi, Rodrigo
Will you please enable the CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS in kernel configuration
and see whether the issue still exists?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13053
ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #9 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-10
02:56:46 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hi, Rodrigo
Will you please enable the CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS in kernel configuration
and see whether the issue still exists?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #8 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-10
02:56:09 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
what do you mean by no success?
is there any error message when inserting the i915 driver?
No errors. I just don't see the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #10 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-10 03:48:46 ---
Thanks for the test.
Now it seems that it will can work well again after enabling the KMS
feature.
If only the video driver is loaded, it will be deferred on the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #11 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-10 06:21:34 ---
From the test the issue is gone if KMS feature is enabled in kernel
configuration and I915 driver is loaded.
So IMO this is not a bug.
Hi, Rui
How about reject
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036
--- Comment #10 from Lin Ming ming.m@intel.com 2009-04-10 07:03:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=20913)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20913)
patch vs 2.6.30-rc1
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Moore, Robert
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036
--- Comment #11 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com
2009-04-10 08:31:05 ---
Ok it does work Lin! =)
Well done!
thanks a lot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13055
Summary: ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution
failed [\_SB_.BAT0._BST] (Node f701ae40), AE_TIME
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc1-git2
Platform: All
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12681
--- Comment #9 from Orivej Desh sm...@bk.ru 2009-04-10 09:20:29 ---
Alexey, I've tested your patch against kernel 2.6.29.1 with gentoo-sources
patches (ArchLinux's kernel26-ice 2.6.29-3) only, and your patch doesn't help:
laptop fails to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
--- Comment #48 from Daniel Qarras dqar...@yahoo.com 2009-04-10 12:27:11 ---
This problem still remains in 2.6.30-rc1 (I am not able to adjust the version
information for this bug).
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13055
ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13055
--- Comment #2 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com
2009-04-10 13:46:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=20923)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20923)
dmesg on sony vaio sr19xn (2.6.30-rc1-git2)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
--- Comment #49 from Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu 2009-04-10
15:28:50 ---
Rafael, I think you should change this to WILL NOT FIX. Not only do we not
know the cause of the problem, it appears to manifest differently on different
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12694
--- Comment #13 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-10 15:55:45 ---
Will you please add the boot option of acpi_sleep=old_ordering and see
whether the box can be shutdown by using hibernate?
a. make sure that platform mode is selected.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
--- Comment #13 from Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com 2009-04-10
15:57:02 ---
It seems that the Windows XP is not much cooler now the suspend kernel...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8549
--- Comment #104 from ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-04-10 16:00:19 ---
Does anyone try the boot option of acpi_sleep=old_ordering and see whether
the box can be shutdown by using hibernate?
echo disk /sys/power/state
Thanks.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
--- Comment #50 from Daniel Qarras dqar...@yahoo.com 2009-04-10 17:17:54 ---
But in 2.6.30-rc1 those attributes should always be turned off by
default. Daniel, can you check to make sure they are?
Actually that seems not to be the case
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036
Lin Ming ming.m@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ming.m@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13053
--- Comment #3 from William Cattey w...@mit.edu 2009-04-10 18:01:07 ---
I'll run those tests.
I predict processor.max_cstate=1 will result in a working system, because this
is all about failure to receive interrupts when we're in C3 state.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13053
--- Comment #4 from William Cattey w...@mit.edu 2009-04-10 18:12:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=20927)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20927)
acpidump output from Dell 760
Not appearing in this log file are two error
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13053
--- Comment #5 from William Cattey w...@mit.edu 2009-04-10 18:28:14 ---
With BIOS setting, processor.maxcstate-=1, as expected, all was fine.
I'll note in passing that powertop showed the CPU spending most of its time
in C state 1.
With BIOS
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
--- Comment #51 from Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu 2009-04-10
18:46:36 ---
But in 2.6.30-rc1 those attributes should always be turned off by
default. Daniel, can you check to make sure they are?
Actually that seems not to be the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
--- Comment #52 from Daniel Qarras dqar...@yahoo.com 2009-04-10 18:55:54 ---
You're looking at the attributes for the wrong devices. Try
/sys/devices/pci:00/*/usb*/../power/wakeup.
Ok, they're disabled:
localhost:~ uname -a
Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13036
--- Comment #13 from Giovanni Pellerano giovanni.peller...@gmail.com
2009-04-10 20:56:50 ---
No, i got them randomly. Should them heve been disappeared?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|len.br...@intel.com |
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12816
--- Comment #25 from Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it 2009-04-11 02:44:09 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
I also have this laptop and have found similar problems to those listed above.
I'd be interested in helping out with any further testing.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12994
--- Comment #14 from Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-04-11
06:02:30 ---
Maciej, can you tell us of a _mainline_ (aka Linus) kernel that behaved better
on your thinkpad than 2.6.29.1 does? And give us an idea (e.g. through
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@sisk.pl
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
--- Comment #19 from Leonid Podolny leonidp.li...@gmail.com 2009-04-11
11:29:35 ---
Ok, the last patch works for any time.
I'm going to upgrade to (unpatched) 2.6.30-rc1.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12998
--- Comment #17 from Sanjoy Mahajan san...@mit.edu 2009-04-11 13:24:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=20938)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20938)
final dmesg (all worked)
I ran that test, and (unfortunately) it suspended
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
--- Comment #13 from Rodrigo L. Batista rodr...@gus-mg.org 2009-04-11
13:41:12 ---
Anyway, it is necessary to make changes in Kconfig to solve build problems.
When i915 is set as builtin and video as module, acpi_video_register() is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13032
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13032
--- Comment #19 from Jose Marino bra...@hotmail.com 2009-04-11 18:53:56 ---
To trigger this bug all I had to do is create some network traffic. By
downloading something or by ssh to a remote machine and running find ..
While bisecting the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13065
Summary: FSC Amilo Pi 1505 reboots after pressing silent mode
special key
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.26-1-amd64
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002
--- Comment #8 from Tiago Requeijo tiago.requeijo@gmail.com 2009-04-11
23:45:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=20941)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20941)
output of dmesg on 2.6.27
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002
--- Comment #9 from Tiago Requeijo tiago.requeijo@gmail.com 2009-04-11
23:47:39 ---
The output of dmesg on 2.6.27 is attached above.
On 2.6.28-xx, the options 'acpi=noirq' and 'pci=noapic' do not work. The boot
process freezes at the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
Summary: Boot freezes, resumes when power button is pressed.
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.27
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
Michael Douglas meh...@mehall.co.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meh...@mehall.co.cc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13048
ykzhao yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjg59-ker...@srcf.ucam.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13002
RogerRamonRamirez ny...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ny...@free.fr
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #32 from Eddy Petrișor eddy.petrisor+lin...@gmail.com 2009-04-12
20:00:49 ---
Are there any new things/patches I should try?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #2 from Michael Douglas meh...@mehall.co.cc 2009-04-12 20:16:50
---
Created an attachment (id=20949)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20949)
acpidump from my computer
ran acpidump as requested.
--
Configure
401 - 500 of 25531 matches
Mail list logo
