[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 --- Comment #15 from Anonymous Emailer anonym...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2009-04-24 17:43:33 --- Reply-To: l...@kernel.org That bug was fixed by commit fc2e4009300088813c3be2de80b01ddc239e cpuidle: update the last_state acpi cpuidle

[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure

[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 Venkatesh Pallipadi venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 Venkatesh Pallipadi venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 --- Comment #12 from Anonymous Emailer anonym...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2009-04-22 18:35:42 --- Reply-To: l...@kernel.org IIRC, C2-popup is supported since core architecture. The system (a T41) is unlikely support this. The T41 is an ICH4M,

[Bug 13145] Processor does not go below C2 if mouse (uhci) is plugged in.

2009-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 --- Comment #13 from Anonymous Emailer anonym...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2009-04-22 22:54:32 --- Reply-To: l...@kernel.org This is not a re-gression, it is a pro-gression:-) In the CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y case, there was a bug where we would enter