http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 00:09 ---
is there any difference if you remove the boot option ec_intr=0?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6332
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #5 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 00:44 ---
with this patch the acpid got 2-3 events for closing the lid
is this different without the patch in comment#50 applied?
hmmm, could you please send the dmesg after closing lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #8 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 00:33 ---
no difference in acpid's output. it still receives 3 events for each action.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 00:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=13414)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13414action=view)
dmesg with acpi=noirq
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8276 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 00:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=13415)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13415action=view)
dmesg with noapic
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 00:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=13416)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13416action=view)
dmesg of default/normal boot
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 02:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=13420)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13420action=view)
acpid's log after closing lid for a few seconds (debug on, button loaded)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 01:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=13419)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13419action=view)
dmesg -c after closing lid for a few seconds (debug on, patched, button
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 01:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=13418)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13418action=view)
acpid's log after closing lid for a few seconds (debug on, patched, button
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5853
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 02:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=13421)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13421action=view)
dmesg -c after closing lid for a few seconds (debug on, button loaded)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6332
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 04:46 ---
A few more links:
Someone elses info on this problem.
http://www.steyla.com/averatec.html
TabletQuestions.com thread on the subject. I have posted a request for others
to test
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6332
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 04:28 ---
Unfortunately, I sold the laptop about 2 months ago. I could have access to it
sometime in the future, but it will probably be after the new year (2008). I
will follow up with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8238
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7884
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7477
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7228
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #9 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8229
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 05:40 ---
*** Bug 8243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 05:50 ---
The (it turns out unrelated) issue, with:
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0
Was due to a bug in the ipw3945 driver trying to access some thermal sensor on
the wireless card
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8049
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|m
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5289
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8049
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6892
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 12:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13426)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13426action=view)
acpi uses driver model flags
Current version of the patch dating from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9313
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5425
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 18:52 ---
Copy a Device is now not allowable.
The allowable source operands of CopyObject is ARGI_DATAREFOBJ, which can be
one of the following:
Integer
String
Buffer
Package
Object
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853
--- Comment #94 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 20:05 ---
I have a T61p, with the same problem since I got it in August.
irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
[c045ad5e] __report_bad_irq+0x36/0x75
[c041c6a4]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5389
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5391
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5692
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5391
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 20:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=13430)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13430action=view)
proposed patch
Have tested aginst ASLTS, no regression
If method call or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5358
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5425
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8298
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|m
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8298
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #14 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8298
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8779
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562
--- Comment #32 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 21:45 ---
(In reply to comment #31)
Matti, are you able to do the test as Bjorn suggested in comment# 29? Or, we
won't be able to track this down... thanks.
I mean on the same mobo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8562
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #31 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8494
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8415
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6208
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 22:09 ---
Ask asus to fix their stupid BIOS, it's really DESIGNED FOR WINDOWS. See below
ASL code, if running OS isn't windows, they will call USB1(), I guess this
method will disable
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8573
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #8
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 22:31 ---
Is it possible the IRQ edge/level is wrong in the _CRS? We did find such buggy
BIOS. please attach the acpidump output, so we can check it.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7477
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 22:34 ---
resolution in bug# 8919 may also helps you...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5832
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5692
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 23:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=13433)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=13433action=view)
patch-add-warning-message-when-loading-wistron-driver
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5692
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-06 23:12 ---
I'm sorry, I don't see the point of warning users like this - is it at all
likely that such a conflict will occur?
Was there ever a conflict between ACPI and the DMI mappings
53 matches
Mail list logo