[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:22 --- (not sure whether out of the box, it must take the right (or say wrong) VID device) That was wrong from myself, it does not use the video device at all (for brightness

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|CODE_FIX

[Bug 10279] suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||10279 nThis|

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:48 --- (In reply to comment #36) That was wrong from myself, it does not use the video device at all (for brightness switching), therefore it should always work. Henrique said

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 02:04 --- (In reply to comment #35) Using the native mode, if I decrease the brightness to 0, I'm unable to return it to any higher value. Why do you open a kernel bug, if you know

[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #69 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 02:59 --- Created an attachment (id=15344) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15344action=view) Archive containing Acer 5720 Fan Control Script + Binary Patcher This is

[Bug 10279] suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|CLOSED Resolution|

[Bug 9432] unable to turn cooling device 'off' - LG LE50 Express laptop

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9432 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 05:59 --- Confirmed on 2.6.25-rc6 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list

[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:04 --- Now I'm a little confused. I previously (i.e. comment #39, comment #41) reverted acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm.patch, but since restore_poll_udelay.patch doesn't make any sense

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:08 --- Better take off the kid gloves. 1. NVidia-GPU-based thinkpads are NOT Intel-GPU-based thinkpads. DO NOT CONFUSE WHAT IS SAID ABOUT ONE WITH THE OTHER. EVER. 2. *IF* you have

[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:49 --- Right. Sorry for confusion. acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm caused several side effects, so it requires 2 more patches with it, one of them big (add_poll_timer). It is too late to add

[Bug 10224] kacpid and kacpi_notify takes 90 % of cpu

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224 --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 08:47 --- I tested both patches, in comment #17 and the updated in comment #21 and the bug seems fixed in my system, still im not sure why the system worked after hard reseting windows.

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 ---

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 [EMAIL

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 ---

[Bug 10265] oops after resume from acpi S3

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 09:32 --- Ok - the bisection is just frustrating - the testing of the acpi functionality with a crashing kernel or without the networking subsystem (the acpid tells me, that it can't

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 09:34 --- (In reply to comment #32) Current versions of X.org **enforces** this. It tells the BIOS to stop controlling the backlight levels, in a much lower level than even the ACPI

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 ---

[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 11:23 --- If X.org is disabling the native stuff when trying to use the kernel, that's already something. It still won't fix all failure modes, though. We really need to be able to let

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 11:29 --- (In reply to comment #41) if I understand correctly the intel driver, it *only* saves and restores backlight values at VT switches. The backlight is controlled by hal daemon

[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 9961] Oops with docking and undocking, device after docking not connected

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961 --- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 14:05 --- I am still struggling with this. I do not fully understand root cause yet but I'm betting that the hot-add of a transparent p2p bridge (on Dock II) immediately below yet

[Bug 43961] Re: Power down after shutdown does not work...

2008-03-19 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team) Status: Incomplete = Triaged ** Changed in: baltix Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux Status: New = Invalid -- Power down after

[Bug 9902] Video module creates input device, but no events happen.

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 14:52 --- Do I still have to provide full dmesg output knowing that the problem is unimplemented IGD OpRegion support? -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 10285] New: backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 Summary: backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline

[Bug 10285] backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- |

[Bug 10285] backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure

[Bug 10285] backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:31 --- Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 Summary:

[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:46 --- Created an attachment (id=15349) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15349action=view) dmesg of vanilla linux-git with 2c81ce4c9c37b910210f2640c28e98a0c398dc26

[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:49 --- Created an attachment (id=15350) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15350action=view) dmesg of linux-git with the 3 patches My dmesg buffer is too small for

[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 17:44 --- It also allows one to use xbacklight to control backlight level. Please check if the Ubuntu HAL config is using xbacklight, or if it is trying to access sysfs backlight

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 ---

[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:12 --- The sizeof patch from comment #33 causes acpi-cpufreq to fail when it's applied to 2.6.24.3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:19 --- Chunk, Please attach dmesg acpidump -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are

[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:54 --- 'hald' runs as a system daemon with dropped priviledges, and doesn't have any dependency on X, so it can't run xbacklight directly. It would be possible to have a program

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:55 --- (In reply to comment #39) Now, about how to fix it. ACPI Video and X.org HAVE to talk to each other. X.org must be able to tell ACPI Video driver to go into an I'm not here

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:00 --- (In reply to comment #45) Or we will have X.org changing the brightness directly in hardware, and ACPI video will know it must *block* (even for reading!) any attempts to

[Bug 9902] Video module creates input device, but no events happen.

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|DEFERRED Resolution|

[Bug 10265] oops after resume from acpi S3

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61

2008-03-19 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:56 --- The only problem is that we can't trust the AML methods to begin with :-) And that we soon will need the same functionality on many ATI cards... IMO, we better just go for the