http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:22 ---
(not sure whether out of the box, it must take the right (or say wrong) VID
device)
That was wrong from myself, it does not use the video device at all (for
brightness
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|CODE_FIX
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BugsThisDependsOn|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||10279
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:48 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
That was wrong from myself, it does not use the video device at all (for
brightness switching), therefore it should always work. Henrique said
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 02:04 ---
(In reply to comment #35)
Using the native mode, if I decrease the brightness to 0, I'm unable to
return it to any higher value.
Why do you open a kernel bug, if you know
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167
--- Comment #69 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 02:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=15344)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15344action=view)
Archive containing Acer 5720 Fan Control Script + Binary Patcher
This is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9432
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 05:59 ---
Confirmed on 2.6.25-rc6
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:04 ---
Now I'm a little confused.
I previously (i.e. comment #39, comment #41) reverted
acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm.patch, but since restore_poll_udelay.patch doesn't
make any sense
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:08 ---
Better take off the kid gloves.
1. NVidia-GPU-based thinkpads are NOT Intel-GPU-based thinkpads. DO NOT CONFUSE
WHAT IS SAID ABOUT ONE WITH THE OTHER. EVER.
2. *IF* you have
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:49 ---
Right. Sorry for confusion.
acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm caused several side effects, so it requires 2 more
patches with it, one of them big (add_poll_timer). It is too late to add
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 08:47 ---
I tested both patches, in comment #17 and the updated in comment #21 and the
bug seems fixed in my system, still im not sure why the system worked after
hard reseting windows.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
[EMAIL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 09:32 ---
Ok - the bisection is just frustrating - the testing of the acpi functionality
with a crashing kernel or without the networking subsystem (the acpid tells me,
that it can't
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 09:34 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Current versions of X.org **enforces** this. It tells the BIOS to stop
controlling the backlight levels, in a much lower level than even the ACPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 11:23 ---
If X.org is disabling the native stuff when trying to use the kernel, that's
already something. It still won't fix all failure modes, though. We really
need to be able to let
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 11:29 ---
(In reply to comment #41)
if I understand correctly the intel driver, it *only* saves and restores
backlight values at VT switches. The backlight is controlled by hal daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 14:05 ---
I am still struggling with this. I do not fully understand root cause
yet but I'm betting that the hot-add of a transparent p2p bridge
(on Dock II) immediately below yet
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)
Status: Incomplete = Triaged
** Changed in: baltix
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: linux
Status: New = Invalid
--
Power down after
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 14:52 ---
Do I still have to provide full dmesg output knowing that the problem is
unimplemented IGD OpRegion support?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
Summary: backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:31 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
Summary:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=15349)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15349action=view)
dmesg of vanilla linux-git with 2c81ce4c9c37b910210f2640c28e98a0c398dc26
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=15350)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15350action=view)
dmesg of linux-git with the 3 patches
My dmesg buffer is too small for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 17:44 ---
It also allows one to use xbacklight to control backlight level.
Please check if the Ubuntu HAL config is using xbacklight, or if it is trying
to access sysfs backlight
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device
is connected to SVGA out port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:12 ---
The sizeof patch from comment #33 causes acpi-cpufreq to fail when it's applied
to 2.6.24.3
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:19 ---
Chunk,
Please attach dmesg acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:54 ---
'hald' runs as a system daemon with dropped priviledges, and doesn't have any
dependency on X, so it can't run xbacklight directly. It would be possible to
have a program
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:55 ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Now, about how to fix it.
ACPI Video and X.org HAVE to talk to each other. X.org must be able to tell
ACPI Video driver to go into an I'm not here
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:00 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
Or we will have X.org changing the brightness directly in
hardware, and ACPI video will know it must *block* (even for reading!) any
attempts to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|DEFERRED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #5 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:56 ---
The only problem is that we can't trust the AML methods to begin with :-) And
that we soon will need the same functionality on many ATI cards...
IMO, we better just go for the
46 matches
Mail list logo