[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #27 from MB (b...@unity-mail.de) --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #26) > > Please test a 5.12 kernel with the patch which I've just attached. > No, with the patch the error is unfortunately still present. > If this patch

[Bug 213353] IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 --- Comment #3 from Zoltan Boszormenyi (zbos...@pr.hu) --- Created attachment 297201 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297201=edit dmesg -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 213353] IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 --- Comment #4 from Zoltan Boszormenyi (zbos...@pr.hu) --- Created attachment 297203 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297203=edit acpidump output -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail

[Bug 212277] Access to ACPI FACS table after release

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212277 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You may

[Bug 212277] Access to ACPI FACS table after release

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212277 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 213353] IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 --- Comment #2 from Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) --- and what if you change the BUF0 ASL code to IRQ (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, ) {4} and build the kernel with the customized DSDT? -- You may reply to this email

[Bug 213353] IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO -- You may

[Bug 213353] IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 --- Comment #5 from Zoltan Boszormenyi (zbos...@pr.hu) --- I was unable to recompile the DSDT because of this error printed by iasl -tc: ... DSDT.dsl 23617: Local1 = WIDR /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C7.WIDR */ Error6058 -

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #29 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- (In reply to sander44 from comment #28) > My fix working with 5.10 branch: I assume you mean the 5.12 branch, the code which your patch is removing does not exist in the 5.10

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #28 from sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) --- My fix working with 5.10 branch: index c49b35e30..cdff9cb03 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -332,39 +332,22 @@ static void

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #30 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- sander44, have you also tried using my patch instead of reverting the changes from 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 ? And if not can you give this a try please ? --

[Bug 213353] IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 Zhang Rui (rui.zh...@intel.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Joey Lee (j...@suse.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@suse.com -- You may

[Bug 203529] ACPI Error: No handler for Region [WST1] (00000000d6bc1741) [GenericSerialBus] - Dell Precision 3630

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203529 --- Comment #15 from secan (secancri...@gmail.com) --- Hello, Same output on Dell PowerEdge T40: [root@vHost ~]# grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status /sys/bus/acpi/devices/ACPI000C:00/status:15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/INT0E0C:00/status:15

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #24 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Good news, a very similar bug is being tracked here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963717 And one of the reporters there has done a git bisect and has found

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #25 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Note as mentioned in the quoted comment to revert 719e1f561afbe020ed175825a9bd25ed62ed1697 you first need to revert 5a6a2c0f0f43676df27632d657a3f18b151a7ef8 So after doing a

[Bug 213353] New: IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 Bug ID: 213353 Summary: IRQs for onboard UARTs are not level-triggered with IRQNoFlags even if the parent section has the defaults in PRS Product: ACPI Version:

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 --- Comment #26 from Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) --- Created attachment 297195 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=297195=edit [PATCH] ACPI: Use _OSC query results to determine caps rather then the commit results