https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #140 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Regarding the MEDION notebooks, we'd get an addon in kernel v6.2.12. I just
want to note it for completeness.
The current list for vendor MEDION:
model: MEDION P15651, board:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #139 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@dirksche,
5.4.0-92 will have this patch.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #138 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
Sorry, that I reopen this issue. But I got some more Questions. My machine is
the S17405. I'm on Linux Mint and the current LTS kernel is 5.4.0-91. I
installed the mainline Kernel 5.15.3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #137 from corax2.05 (corax2...@gmx.net) ---
Thanks Manuel and Dirk,
it seems it's more a Manjaro or a configuration thing.
Befor some weeks I changed the keyboard settings in KDE, but that doesen't
help.
I will take a look at the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #136 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
(In reply to Manuel Krause from comment #135)
> (In reply to dirksche from comment #134)
> > Right now I try the patch linux-image-5.15.0-rc5+_5.15.0-rc5+-383_amd64.deb
> > from Comment 119
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #135 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to dirksche from comment #134)
> Right now I try the patch linux-image-5.15.0-rc5+_5.15.0-rc5+-383_amd64.deb
> from Comment 119 once more. And on my Medion S17405 both
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #134 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
Right now I try the patch linux-image-5.15.0-rc5+_5.15.0-rc5+-383_amd64.deb
from Comment 119 once more. And on my Medion S17405 both keys @ and € do work
(this comment is written with this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #133 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to corax2.05 from comment #132)
> Many thanks to all!
> The fixes arrived in the last Manjaro 5.16RC1 Kernel.
>
> Generally it works fine.
> But I have a problem with
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #132 from corax2.05 (corax2...@gmx.net) ---
Many thanks to all!
The fixes arrived in the last Manjaro 5.16RC1 Kernel.
Generally it works fine.
But I have a problem with some "special" keys.
@ and € don't work, by pressing nothing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #130 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
OK, thanks.
The fixing patches are in the mainline kernel and in the stable kernels. Let us
close this bug as fixed (Looks like I don't have the right to change the bug
status).
Two
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|5.11.+ |5.11.+ ..
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #128 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
@Manuel Krause
Thanks. See you in another thread.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #127 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@dirksche,
really nice result, thank you very much for participating and reporting back
for your machine type!
Regarding the Fn+ keys, I assume, that most of them get
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #126 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@dirksche,
Got it. I will upstream the fix for s17 machines and then backport it to ubuntu
kernels.
About the "20 seconds long grey screen", it is expected since I didn't enable
most
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #125 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
Yeah. The keyboard works now (not the F keys). But I got a 20 seconds long grey
screen before and after the login screen.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #124 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
I will give it a try on Linux Mint. Thanks
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #123 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
The fix for machines of s17 series is not merged to ubuntu kernel yet. Could
you try the testing kernel of comment 119, it is debian format. If you can't
install that kernel, I will
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #122 from dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) ---
@Hui Wang as you asked in comment 117 I'm ready for testing your patch for
S17405. I'm not able to built a kernel and include your patch. but you did
offer an easier way in comment 107
I use
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
dirksche (dirks...@posteo.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirks...@posteo.de
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #120 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Hui Wang
I think it's allowed to share a success result of @Michael Pilz regarding his
MEDION S15449/M15T and the new patch revision.
He managed to install a v5.13.02 kernel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #119 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@corax2.05
I am not familiar with Manjaro Linux. I built a testing kernel with those 2
patches, it is debian format, hope you could install it and boot with that
kernel under Manjaro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #118 from corax2.05 (corax2...@gmx.net) ---
Created attachment 299197
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=299197=edit
Manjaro 5.14 PKGBUILD
@Hui Wang, I tried to compile the kernel with your patches, but sadly it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #117 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
The patch for machines with M17T is waiting for testing (in the comment 107),
corax2.05 or anyone who have that machine, please help test it when you have
time.
--
You may reply to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #116 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
A current summary of covered Notebooks based on an actual search of today:
Medion BOARD_
modelNAME
name
S17405 M17T, patch incoming soon
S15499 typo? /no info
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #115 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Fredy, I saw your current ubuntu kernel is 5.11.0-37, the fix is already in
the ubuntu kernel 5.11.0-38, and the -38 kernel is in the -proposed ppa, you
could enable the -proposed
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #114 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Fredy: You've proved, that you are human. All okay. :-)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #113 from Fredy (fredysco...@hotmail.com) ---
Sorry for the absurd text so long. I thought that the email was not going to be
published as a forum but it was a personal email
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Adrien (ker...@asdrip.fr) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ker...@asdrip.fr|
--
You may reply to this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #112 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to Fredy from comment #111)
> Hi, Hui Wang
> > I have a NOTEBOOK MEDION AKOYA S15449 MD62014
>
> I have to send the output of dmsg in two emails due to excess length.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #111 from Fredy (fredysco...@hotmail.com) ---
Hi, Hui Wang
> I have a NOTEBOOK MEDION AKOYA S15449 MD62014
I have to send the output of dmsg in two emails due to excess length.
This is part two
> dmesg ->
> [6.157744] raid6:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #110 from Fredy (fredysco...@hotmail.com) ---
Hi, Hui Wang
> I have a NOTEBOOK MEDION AKOYA S15449 MD62014
I have to send the output of dmsg in two emails due to excess length.
This is part one
> dmesg ->
> Hi, Hui Wang
> I have a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #109 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Fredy
What is your machine (brand and model)? And what's linux distribution you
installed and the kernel version?
It is better you upload the dmesg of your machine.
--
You may reply
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Fredy (fredysco...@hotmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fredysco...@hotmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #107 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
Created attachment 299123
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=299123=edit
testing patches for s17405
@corax2.05,
I just upload a patches.tar.gz which contains 2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #106 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Manuel,
The patch is already in the linux-next, and I backported it to ubuntu kernels:
5.14.0 and later, 5.13.0, 5.11.0 and 5.4.0. Right now the 5.13.0 (Impish)
kernel applied this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #105 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Some one else?
I really want to encourage any (silent) readers, suffering from this keyboard
issue, but not having the 'M17T' or 'M15T' in the "sudo dmesg | grep DMI:"
result,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #104 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to corax2.05 from comment #102)
> Here it is:
> [0.00] DMI: MEDION S17405/M17T, BIOS 208 11/19/2020
@corax2.05:
Thank you very much for the provided DMI info!
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #103 from corax2.05 (corax2...@gmx.net) ---
I see, there was a mistake in my last post. S17405 is the right model.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #102 from corax2.05 (corax2...@gmx.net) ---
Here it is:
[0.00] DMI: MEDION S17405/M17T, BIOS 208 11/19/2020
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #101 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Hi corax2.05!
(In reply to corax2.05 from comment #100)
> I have the same problem with my Akoya S17403 and followed this discussion
> since june.
This model has not been on our
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
corax2.05 (corax2...@gmx.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corax2...@gmx.net
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #298797|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #98 from Michael Pilz (mp...@gmx.de) ---
Hui Wang, thanks for your work on this bug.
Manuel Krause, thanks for keeping pushing to get the new patch in the kernel.
It's the first time that i raise my voice in a forum like this - I
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Michael Pilz (mp...@gmx.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mp...@gmx.de
--
You may
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Alex (apos...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||apos...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #96 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Created attachment 298797
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298797=edit
Improved patch by Hui Wang [v2]
Improved coding according to Rafael J. Wysocki's
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #95 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Hi Bandipus,
this BUG text is really too long to read ;-)
The current working solution is to patch the kernel with
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298635
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Bandipus (adolfili...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adolfili...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #93 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to Hui Wang from comment #92)
> Please ignore the patch of comment #90. only test the patch of comment #91.
>
> thx.
@Hui Wang and all others:
This new patch works as
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #92 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
Please ignore the patch of comment #90. only test the patch of comment #91.
thx.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #91 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
Created attachment 298635
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298635=edit
replaced testing patch with dmi info used.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #90 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
Created attachment 298633
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298633=edit
testing patch with dmi info used
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #89 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
Thanks davpal for sharing a similar bug.
And @Manuel,
when you have time, please test the new patch, at least this patch will not
affect other machines since it uses dmi info to work.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
dav...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dav...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #88 from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #87 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Hui Wang,
thank you very much for sharing your thoughts!
Please let me know, if you need detailed info about DMI and / or MADT/APIC
table from my system (and how I could provide
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #86 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Manuel,
The last way I could think of is to add quirk with DMI info. I looked into the
code recently, the IRQ0 - IRQ15 is ISA-style interrupt and is edge-sensive and
high-trigger by
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #85 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Hui Wang and all others:
I simply followed your suggestion. If you've got another boot variable(s)
useful in addition, please let me know. After my "marathon" in testing boot
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #84 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Created attachment 298493
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298493=edit
dmesg log with v5.13.13 and acpi=noirq
Just to add a log with the last suggestion.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #83 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to Hui Wang from comment #82)
> @Manuel,
>
> Maybe the bootargs "acpi=noirq" could fix the keyboard issue. This will let
> kernel use i8259 interrupt controller instead
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #82 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Manuel,
Maybe the bootargs "acpi=noirq" could fix the keyboard issue. This will let
kernel use i8259 interrupt controller instead of io-apic. When you have time,
please help test it.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #81 from Adrien (ker...@asdrip.fr) ---
(In reply to Manuel Krause from comment #80)
> (In reply to Adrien from comment #50)
> > On my acer swift 3 (SF314-51), I can't boot on my device since 4.19.198 (no
> > issue with 4.19.197)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #80 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to Adrien from comment #50)
> On my acer swift 3 (SF314-51), I can't boot on my device since 4.19.198 (no
> issue with 4.19.197) without adding "acpi=off" in the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #79 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to beng from comment #78)
> I am using the Medion notebook too. It is not such a good machine, it is
> for Windows only with official support from the company.
>
> But
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
beng (ben16...@protonmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ben16...@protonmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|pgnet@gmail.com |
--
You may reply to this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #77 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Can someone, please, pick up the aforementioned issues with the i2c <-> UART ?
It's no good idea to block out these topics vice versa: The ACPI-compliant fix
from Hui Wang vs.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #75 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Manuel,
So far I have no idea where the exception/quirk should be put, upstream usually
prefers a generic fix, so it is highly possible that the excpetion/quirk in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #74 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Hui Wang:
Picking up @PGNd's idea of "the other way round" straight and given the fact
that there are so many exceptions for devices in the Linux kernel (e.g. for
buggy PCI
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #73 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Ben Greear:
Many thanks for trying that other patch and sharing a dmesg log!
@Hui Wang:
Would it be a solution to take the other working signal state? Or would you
consider it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #72 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
I'm certainly no expert here, but the issue seems to me to be related to
whether i2c is controlling multiple virtual nodes, vs real bus devices
Rather than attempting to make exceptions for
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #71 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Ben Greear and @PGNd,
>From the log provided by Ben, the culprit is also the UART (serial port).
[2.191723] ACPI: IRQ 4 override to edge, high
[2.192072] pnp 00:02: [dma 0
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #70 from Ben Greear (gree...@candelatech.com) ---
Created attachment 298095
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298095=edit
dmesg with modified patch
The modified patch boots on my system fine, dmesg is attached.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #69 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
In reply to Ben Greear from comment #66)
> you want dmesg of boot with the buggy patch applied? I'm not sure it will
> even boot at all, at least in any sane amount of time.
If
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #68 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
(In reply to Ben Greear from comment #66)
> you want dmesg of boot with the buggy patch applied? I'm not sure it will
> even boot at all, at least in any sane amount of time.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #67 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
You will only see a result, if you try...
I'm definitely not the folk being impolite or pushing you to things you don't
like to do. We aren't here for such ugly things.
I
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #66 from Ben Greear (gree...@candelatech.com) ---
you want dmesg of boot with the buggy patch applied? I'm not sure it will even
boot at all, at least in any sane amount of time.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #65 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Ben Greear:
I don't see any dmesg log from you of a boot with this patch. Can you please
provide it?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #64 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
@Hui Wang:
Maybe, you remember:
>From your first patch proposals there had been two well working setups on here.
+ if (gsi == 1) {
+ trig =
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #63 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Thank you for your info also provided on here. I've also read the related LKML
messages.
I'm not confident with a complete withdrawal of this patch. I personally don't
have
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #62 from Ben Greear (gree...@candelatech.com) ---
Created attachment 298087
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298087=edit
dmesg from 5.13.5+ with patch reverted.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #61 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
> I just sent the revert patch out a moment ago.
thx.
Does the revert against upstream
0ec4e55e9f571f08970ed115ec0addc691eda613
automatically flow to stable branch(es)?
or do backports,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #60 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Ben Greear,
Could you please upload the dmesg of 5.13.0 (booting without any issues), let
us see if it is the uart or not.
And BTW, I just sent the revert patch out a moment ago.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Ben Greear (gree...@candelatech.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #58 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
Sounds like _maybe_ @Adrien's issue isn't related.
The others clearly are.
A verifying (or not) bisect from @Adrien, might still be useful.
If only to eventually fixing original KYBD issue
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #57 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@PGNd and @Adrien,
The patch is not merged to 4.19.y stable kernel at all.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #56 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
(In reply to PGNd from comment #54)
> to my count above, there are 3 reported instances of this commit causing
> boot failures on three different devices, not including @Adrien's issue
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #55 from Adrien (ker...@asdrip.fr) ---
(In reply to Hui Wang from comment #53)
> @Adrien,
>
> According to the dmesg-4.19.197, the patch will not bring the influence on
> your machine.
>
> Could you try the 5.14-rc kernel, like
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #54 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
to my count above, there are 3 reported instances of this commit causing boot
failures on three different devices, not including @Adrien's issue
i've currently got 6 servers affected by this^
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #53 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
@Adrien,
According to the dmesg-4.19.197, the patch will not bring the influence on your
machine.
Could you try the 5.14-rc kernel, like
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #52 from Adrien (ker...@asdrip.fr) ---
Created attachment 298079
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=298079=edit
Acer Swift 3 dmesg output 4.19.197
(In reply to PGNd from comment #51)
> > On my acer swift 3 (SF314-51)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #51 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
> On my acer swift 3 (SF314-51)
yet another i2c device (Synaptics trackpad?)
can you bisect?
or at least pastebin a peek into logs booted to latest running kernel:
dmesg | egrep -i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
Adrien (ker...@asdrip.fr) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ker...@asdrip.fr
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #49 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Hui Wang from comment #46)
> The PGNd's issue is same as the one of comment32~37, the root cause is in
> the comment36.
>
> so far, the affected pnp device hid is PNP0501, maybe we
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #48 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
iiuc, it the mobo's allocating i2c to a softserial/uart
although *I* don't see this commit-related issue, so far, on any *other* board
I've got around here, I'm not clear on why exactly it'd be
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #47 from Manuel Krause (manuelkra...@netscape.net) ---
Thank you for your added info and explanation, now it's eeasier for me to
understand.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #46 from Hui Wang (hui.w...@canonical.com) ---
The PGNd's issue is same as the one of comment32~37, the root cause is in the
comment36.
so far, the affected pnp device hid is PNP0501, maybe we could add an exception
according to this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213031
--- Comment #45 from PGNd (pgnet@gmail.com) ---
> Quite a long command line...
ack'd.
&, just to not be un-clear, it's been working -- in this content/form -- for
ages. and, still does ...
up to the aforementioned commit.
--
You may
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
