Re: Changes to Activity Configuration UI

2012-04-30 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 30.04.2012 11:35, Marco Martin wrote: On Sunday 29 April 2012, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: 3. Remove the label Lock as private from the switch. Instead, put icons similar to http://dribbble.com/shots/415967-Privacy-Settings on the corresponding sides of the switch 4. Move the private switch next

Re: Changes to Activity Configuration UI

2012-04-30 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Sorry, I forgot something: Please also change the label of the Close button to Cancel. A Close button implies that pressing the button has no other effect than closing the dialog (whoch is the case in instant apply dialogs). However, in the Task Dialog case, any changes made will be lost, so

Re: Changes to Activity Configuration UI

2012-04-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 30 April 2012, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: First of all: I think it looks a lot nicer now, much cleaner and less verbose. :) I agree that the row with the name and lock widgets does not look well balanced right now. I wonder if it would look less - or even more - unbalanced if you

Re: Changes to Activity Configuration UI

2012-04-30 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On 30.04.2012 14:26, Marco Martin wrote: probably worse... maybe restore the Activity name: label with some tweaks to make it as wide as the switch, so would center the text field again Would Name also work, perhaps? Or is it too short to counterbalance the switch? Aaron and Fania expressed a

Re: Changes to Activity Configuration UI

2012-04-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 30 April 2012, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: On 30.04.2012 14:26, Marco Martin wrote: probably worse... maybe restore the Activity name: label with some tweaks to make it as wide as the switch, so would center the text field again Would Name also work, perhaps? Or is it too short to

Changes to Activity Configuration UI

2012-04-29 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Hi all, after the long and heated debate about the changes to the Activity Configuration UI suggested by Aaron seems to have settled, it seems unclear what we actually want to change. In order to allow actual changes to happen, I have extracted from the discussion the things I think we agreed