It is really cool.
Todd, this may be a sign that you need to get out more :-)
-- Original Message --
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:54:47 -0400
Sure,
Small, medium or Large.
Also
Hm ... That could have been one of the ideas behind this feature.
However, it seems to be a rather nasty feature, especially in AD environment
that contain firewalls that separate the schema master from Exchange boxes.
(I know, I know ... Firewalls WITHIN a AD environment?). There is a KB
Just to let you know the Sourceforge site for the Windows Server
Documentation Project has been approved. Mail me off list and I will set
everyone up on it.
Look forward to hearing from ya :)
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall
Sent: 23 October 2003 09:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have a Windows 2003 Active Directory and I have a OU with
10 objects, and I have a query with ASP. The
problem is that when I like to present the query descending by fechaUpload
(for example), Active doesn't order it.
The code is the following one:
oCommand.properties(size
Received my very own copy of Mr. Robbie Allen's
"Tuna" book last night from Amazon.com - in the first night's reading the book
is already proving it's worth as I see how to do certain things much simpler
than I had done them before (with regards to the VBScripts included), as well as
learn
Raul
Is the leading space character in fechaUpload you have below also in your actual
code? This might explain it.
oCommand.properties(sort on)= fechaUpload
Tony
-- Original Message --
From: Raul Martínez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After upgrading our DCs to 2003 (actually rebuilds) everything
is running smoothly EXCEPT for win95. (Possibly 98 also) I know that they are
no longer supported, and havent been for some time, but we are a
University. We do have a deadline of Jan 1 that all 9x machines be gone. But
until
The upgrade to W2003enforces 2 policies (previously not enforced).
Disabling them and thereby weakening your security(but hey ... it might
get your users back to work) in the Default Domain Controllers Policy might do
the job for you:
Microsoft Network Server: Digitally sign communications
Me too then because I read that and thought Cool as well But then I
have thought for some time now (at least since May or maybe April) that I
needed to get out and experience more. Not sure if that is because I have
been stuck in E2K really deep for that time or it is something else. But all
Do you have the ISBN number? Sounds perfect.
Olly
-Original Message-
From: Lou Vega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 14:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Cookbook
Received my very own copy of Mr. Robbie Allen's Tuna book last night
from
Active Directory Cookbook for Windows Server 2003 and Windows 2000
by Robbie Allen
Publisher: O'Reilly Associates; (September 23, 2003)
ISBN: 0596004648
Just ordered it myself. :)
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003
ISBN- 0-596-00464-8
Robert Rutherford
+44 (0)1305 208232
+44 (0)7970 122362
Oliver Marshall
Digitally signed is not enabled and
digitally encrypt is set to when possible. And I should have stated in my
original email that the DSclient is installed but it might not be the newest
one. I did get the new one from MS 3 weeks ago, and posted the location to
campus, but Im not sure if
0-596-00464-8
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver Marshall
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Cookbook
Do you have the ISBN number? Sounds perfect.
Olly
(that's an old english saying, might be somewhat stronger in other
languages!!) :)
I have to write an article on AD 2.0 under Windows 2003 server. Thing
is, its been given to me at very short notice, and I
needesome inspiration and some information.
Does anyone know of a site (other
I guess I should have started my research
with this list instead of ending here.I found the earlier posts from 2
weeks ago about 2003 and 9x clients. I will make sure that the new DSClient IS
installed and go from there. I actually saw them at the time. But give
me a break, my memory is
How is your Dutch ;-)? I've writte numerous articles on this topic for
European magazines (Windows .Net Magazine dutch version). Feel free to ask
for them if you're interested.
If the short notice is too short to take a language course in Dutch you
might find some inspiration on the O'Reilly
Agreed - I got mine yesterday from Amazon and I must say that this should be on the shelf of every AD administrator. Period.
Michael Parent MCSE MCT
Analyst I - Web Services
ITOS - Systems Enablement
Maritime Life Assurance Company
(902) 453-7300 x3456
Lou Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
Thanks John,
Though I cant speak/read dutch, I would like to have a look at any you
have there relating to 2003. Perhaps I could run some through Babelfish
Ta
Olly
-Original Message-
From: John Reijnders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 16:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I am trying to understand what is happening in the background
processon a DNS server after configuring a Delegated Zone. Here is
the DNS and AD (Windows 2000) DC setup
ABC.COM
(Top Level Domain)
DNS1
DNS2
ABC.COM ADI
XYZ1.ABC.COM-Delegated
XYZ2.ABC.COM-Delegated
Title: Message
More
information on the setup? Forwarders etc are configured how? Event
log is saying what?
60%
doesn't seem so bad from a process standpoint, but it should still be
answering. Are these large zones?
Assuming the latest software on the 2000 DNS servers.
-Original
Title: Message
Forwarders: Child DNS servers are
forwarding to top level DNS server. Top level DNS server is forwarding to
ISP
It is a large DNS Zone but there is no Zone
transfer because it is a Delegated Zone.
I havent seen any useful info in Eventlog
other than DNS timeout errors
Title: Message
Thanks
for all of the positive feedback about the book. I give the credit to my
all-star cast of reviewers :-)
My
main goal was to produce a referencethat would help AD admins get their
job done quicker and easier. There is just too much stuff AD admins have
to remember
Ordered it second hand... not a book I would give up it is a good quick
book to refer to. And who read it memorized it and sold it back already,
how exactly does that work G...
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:06 AM
To:
Title: Message
I just ordered
your book and can't wait to have it in my technical
library.
Ron
-Original Message-From: Robbie Allen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:43
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Active Directory
Title: Message
Not
responding to what? Client requests right?
Can
you post that event entry?
Any AV
on these servers? They are up to date as well right?
-Original Message-From: Santhosh
Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October
24, 2003 12:35 PMTo:
Title: Message
Yes. DNS servers are not responding to
client quires. Unfortunately, I cannot post the event log entries.
Any AV???
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003
11:50 AM
To:
Title: Message
Anti
Virus programs
-Original Message-From: Santhosh
Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October
24, 2003 1:04 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [ActiveDir] DNS and CPU Usage
Yes. DNS servers are not responding to
client quires.
Let's say I have adomain called DomainA.com
and now my organization is talking with another organization who would like to
have DomainB.com. Management at both organizations would like "pretty seamless"
access to each other's resources while maintaining their own identities...i.e,
DomainB
Title: Message
Norton and it is up to date!
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003
12:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS and
CPU Usage
Anti Virus programs
Title: Message
Well,
its cake and pie, really. When setting up AD you're simply going to select the
option to create a new domain in an existing forest. THe only issue will be that
the two domains need to see each other via DNS - which generally means you're
going to secondary each other's
Title: Message
What's
in the exclude list? I don't doubt it's up to date or even think you have
a virus (not that it's impossible, but I'm wondering if something else is going
on).
-Original Message-From: Santhosh
Sivarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October
Title: Message
It's a great book.
Two questions: 1) did you guru's here on activedir come to
the conclusion that, due to password complexity, a user should be created
disabled? Does that affect any recipes other than 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3? 2) I think
you should add one of the simplest and (in
I'm interested...
-gil
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers
Just to let you know the Sourceforge site for the Windows Server
Documentation Project
Me too
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:46 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers
I'm interested...
-gil
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall
yup
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers
Me too
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil
Off-list people, please. Oh, and you forgot your /AOL Mode tag.
Mail me off list and I will set everyone up on it.
- Original Message -
From: Craig Cerino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:55 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] documenting servers
Me
This is an ASP page that gives lots of useful info on your windows
systems. Make sure you run in on an IIS box under credentials that have
rights.
I have other ASP pages that will report back Service Pack and hotfixes.
As always
Be sure to test this in test lab first.
I can not be responsible
Hello from a long time listener/first time caller.
I have a Windows 2000 AD Domain and I am on a call with PSS
right now concerning my XP machine running the Windows 2003 AdminPak and the
new GPMC utility. My problem is that when I open the Windows Settings
under User Configuration I
No, no, no. Don't eMail ME off-list, eMail Oliver off-list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will add you to the list.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] documenting servers
Robbie,
I haven't gotten my copy of your book yet, I know :-(, I waited until just recently to
order it. I looked at the table of contents but did not see any thing about
Certificate Services, is it there and I just missed it??
If it is not in your book, as the Master of Cookbooks can you
HEY - so we have a learning disability -- ease up. :o)
Ok - -how many people emailed you? :O)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] documenting
DomainB wants to be separate in what sense? You mean they want their login to
remain the same? they want their email address to remain the same? Websites?
And what resources are we needing seamless access to? Exchange in the
picture? If so, do they want seamless GAL?
The reason I'm asking is
Separate identity - i.e., don't want to be known as DomainB.DomainA.Com, but
rather known as DomainB.Com.
Resources are mostly Data and Websites. Exchange is not in the picture.
From what I gather so far I'm looking at a forest with a child domain
(DomainA.com is the root, so DomainB.com would
While not a cookbook per se, I have found this link useful in my
understanding of PKI:
http://tinyurl.com/s8y1
HTH
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
www.akomolafe.com
www.iyaburo.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
Thanks. I can see I will have some reading to do this weekend.
Dan
Original Message
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Cookbook
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, October 24, 2003 12:57 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While not a cookbook per se, I have found this link
Title: Message
Yes, it's different for Exchange 2003.- it has no
communication requirement with Schema FSMO during installation- also,
additional servers can be installed with Exchange Full Admin at the
Administrative Group level (used to require Full Org privilege with Exchange
2000 -
Title: Message
Michael -
1) Yes, this is one way. Just discussed this topic on
the list, with code samples, so check the archives. Setting the user to
disabled and then applying the complex password is valid.
2) Not there directly ;-)
Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCTMicrosoft MVP - Active
Title: Message
Hey Rob,
What about this donate a cookbook
a month for someone who comes up with a great idea for additions to the next
version of the cookbook.
Basically the submissions have to follow
the format of the book, and have to work.
They would be judge based on the
Todd,
You are s badd
Dan
Original Message
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Cookbook
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, October 24, 2003 9:54 pm
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Rob,
What about this
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Cookbook
Dan,
What are the topics in PKI architecture
you want to understand?
What issue are you trying to solve using
PKI in your organization?
What are the specific needs in your
organization and what Windows 200x services do you want to
Na, I am not that Bad, it is the guy who keeps auto responding to every
message we send on the list. He needs a hockey puck; Slapshot style.
Rick! Care to address the issue?
Thanks,
Toddler
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October
AH... Didn't think someone would try that but it is valid. I don't have a
lab to test right this second, but I think I would start with removing the
reset password and see if that buys anything.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hmmm I downloaded that and looked at it, I like sidtoname much better
F:\Dev\cpp\SidToNamesidtoname S-1-5-21-1275210071-789336058-1957994488-1113
SidToName V02.00.00cpp Joe Richards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) March 2003
[User]: JOEHOME\hosehead
The command completed successfully.
Title: Message
And
what have you been drinking at 1am??:-) Good thought, but my guess
is that peoplewhooffer goodsuggestions probably already have a
copy of the book (since they know what'sin there and what isn't).
FWIW, I would be happy to mentionin the
acknowledgements section anyone who
Right up front, the domain rename scares me. Everyone seems to say, yeah it
is there but
Before I answer anything else though, what kind of data do you have in AD?
Is it the basic NOS stuff or have you deployed Exchange or other AD aware
apps that have populated it? My guess is you aren't
Title: Message
Hey,
You must be up late too.
Dan
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robbie Allen
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003
10:40 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active
Directory Cookbook
And what
57 matches
Mail list logo
