RE: [ActiveDir] Users and Computers

2004-09-08 Thread Ulf B. Simon-Weidner
Title: Message Hello Andrew, no, that's not able to extract in AD. The most popular solution for that request is to log that to a central file or database within the logon-script. Gruesse - Sincerely, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [ActiveDir] RPC Netlogon to AD

2004-09-08 Thread Lara Adianto
It uses either Kerberos or NTLM based on the best protocol that can be negotiated (using the Negotiate protocol). I don’t believe you can disable the netlogon. Also, your question doesn’t make sense to me as the server IS using Kerberos (or NTLM) to authenticate the user to AD.Oh, I don't know

[ActiveDir] ADC Issues

2004-09-08 Thread Roy . Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- We are seeing quite a few MSADC 8139 errors that talk about ensuring the servers are in sync. We have confirmed our Win2k DC's and Ex5.5 servers are in sync to within sub 1 second. Any ideas why these we still get this alert. Roy

[ActiveDir] ADC Issue

2004-09-08 Thread Roy . Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- We are seeing quite a few MSADC 8139 errors that talk about ensuring the servers are in sync. We have confirmed our Win2k DC's and Ex5.5 servers are in sync to within sub 1 second. Any ideas why these we still get this alert. Roy

RE: [ActiveDir] RPC Netlogon to AD

2004-09-08 Thread Depp, Dennis M.
Kerberos is the protocol of choice in Windows 2000/2003 domains. Kerberos will be initially used on any authentication requests between a Winsows 2000 or higher client and a Windows 2000/2003 resource. If the resource is an NT 4.0 server of if Kerberos fails, the authentication will resort to

RE: [ActiveDir] Users and Computers

2004-09-08 Thread Depp, Dennis M.
While I can't get this information from Active Directory, it is possible to get this information from the domain controllers. You can look through your security logs on the domain controllers for event 540. This event will give you the user who logged on and also the ip address of the machine

RE: [ActiveDir] Users and Computers

2004-09-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
Title: Message Are you referring to "in the past"? Only by looking at security audit records or writing an app that stores the information, as other people have already said. But if you are referring to "currently logged on", you can get that:

RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Issue

2004-09-08 Thread Mulnick, Al
IIRC, the 8139 error actually talks about modifications that were made on the source and target out of order. The source target was updated after the source before sync in other words. This can be caused by time sync issues as you can imagine, but in your case if the time sync is properly

RE: [ActiveDir] ADC Issue

2004-09-08 Thread Roy . Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Time sync is working on all DC's fine. We check that no other admin tasks were taking place, for a period of time, 30 minutes, we had over 700 event id for 8139, this has now dropped to just 5 in the past 2 hours. We stopped the ADC replication, restarted the

RE: [ActiveDir] Users and Computers

2004-09-08 Thread Perdue David J Contr InDyne/Enterprise IT
Title: Message The below link on JSI shows a way to pull it from the DCs. http://www.jsiinc.com/SUBQ/tip8400/rh8433.htm Dave From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Caple, AndrewSent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 10:07 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir]

[ActiveDir] Fun with Kerberos

2004-09-08 Thread Guy Teverovsky
Stumbled upon an issue couple of days ago and wanted to hear what you guys think about it. Suppose that your AD is called myad.com and you also configure additional UPN suffix company.com. Now I create 2 users in child.myad.com child domain: 1) sAMAccountName: guy userPrincipalName: [EMAIL

RE: [ActiveDir] Users and Computers

2004-09-08 Thread Caple, Andrew
Title: Message Thanks everyone for your help --- it will make my life a lot easier! Andrew -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perdue David J Contr InDyne/Enterprise ITSent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:00 AMTo: '[EMAIL