Hello,
I have a
domain and several computers in that. Tow or three of computers have been
disconnected from domain with out being removed from AD first. Now I can
not remove it from AD. It gives me this error: The DSA object can not be
deleted.
What is the
way to remove these computers
1)DNS DNS
2)Try ADSI tool
Roseta radfar wrote:
Hello,
I have a
domain and several computers in that. Tow or three of computers have
been
disconnected from domain with out being removed from AD first. Now I
can
not remove it from AD. It gives me this error: The DSA object
If you just disconnected the DC(s) without demoting it/them, the metadata from
that/those DC(s) is still in AD. To remove AD metadata look at the following
articles. These explain very well on how to do it.
How to remove data in Active Directory after an unsuccessful domain controller
demotion
FYI
Potential file corruption problem on NTFS volumes during extensive stress tests
in Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;909360
Cheers,
Jorge
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It
The biggest issue, IMO, with virtualizing DCs is possibility of rollback. It
is also a pretty cool strength if you are doing it on purpose and really
know what you are doing, think of a very cool forest recovery feature if you
can truly manage it properly. Mostly I would expect most places to mess
Interesting, O'Reilly doesn't even have it listed yet. I just heard from the
O'Reilly that it is finally out of copy-edit.
On the co-author piece. Alistaire wrote the initial edition, Robbie did the
2nd Edition update, I did the 3rd Edition update. You may want to ask the
reviewers (they almost
Err shoot for a subject change next time.
:o)
The answer to your question... NO.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whaley,
GregSent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:35 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Lag
Site
Is it
possible to
Correct.
If you are aware of such special users in advance (or after you stumble over
them) it is good to somehow mark their account so you know it the next time.
Put them in a special OU or add a special attribute or set some existing
attribute to some value. Then you can tell oldcmp to avoid
Title: Domain Controller Consolidation utilizing Dual Core CPUs
I actually stumbled on a page[1] I hadn't seen before where
MP is acknowledged for the scaling ratio, at least in the 8-proc configuration.
They indicate that you have to use a 75% scaling factor so an 8 proc GC is
actually
I agree that you should properly review the situation before deploying
anything.
I disagree on the comments on the domain security boundary stuff. Like it or
not, the forest IS the security boundary. There isn't any so-so security
boundary at the domain level. Account Policy and sort of
Is it me or is that a dumb KB?
A volume is full or almost full.
Yeah data will start getting screwed up when you have that situation.
In SBSland we lose our CAL licenses and other such fun things on a too
tight drive.
Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote:
FYI
Potential file corruption
Part legacy. It didn't replicate in NT4, it would be a a
serious change in functionality if it all of a sudden started replicating. Some
people used that attribute to determine which DCs were being "used" the most and
processing the most auths. Also it told you where customers were authing
Think how bad they would be at the material if they didn't teach it. :o)
I would say that there are some people who don't care if they look like
idiots while up in front of others. I can think of a presenter I saw this
year that made me cringe. I knew it was going to be rough going in having
Smoking Nothing... Inhaling Well mortar and grout dust mostly...
Yeah there were a lot of reviewers and yes I expect to see more than 2000
sold. I was being sarcastic. I know I shouldn't spring new MO's on people
like that. ;o)
Just the same folks, buy buy buy. Give to every person you
Hmmm. I guess I see this in a different light. In my new, improved view
of the way that Microsoft communicates things, no - it doesn't seem to be
very dumb at all. The statement and the KB, that is.
At this moment, I'm watching George Carlin's new HBO special. He relates
that he's always
Not dumb for Microsoft dumb for the Admin to get the drive in that
condition and need a KB to wack them upside the head.
At the end of the day... it's my responsibility for my network. I won't
be complaining to Microsoft that they didn't warn me that bad things
might happen if I don't
Not that he isn't clever and funny, but I don't think George Carlin has
written any new material in 20 years.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
You weren't the only one [1]
Tony
[1] ...but I'm guessing you were the most vocal.
;-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Saturday, 5 November 2005 10:41 a.m.To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT (somewhat):
Exchange Server
Frankly my expectation from a file system that's marked as being robust and
enterprise ready is that you should lose nothing if the drive is almost
full, and the file system should shut down gracefully if the drive is full,
especially in normal situations.
Sysadmins should not have to worry that
Thanks for the thought, Brian. After your
suggestion, I tried to do some research on DFSR. Beyond the MSDN schematics and
an article that seems to get reprinted on several sites, I cant
really find anything about how well this works. I realize that it is in beta
right now but have you seen
What would be the suggested RAID and partitioning
scheme for a Domain controller.
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks.
Dan Cox
since R2 is in public Beta now
(http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/default.mspx), you'll be well
served if you just join in and test it out yourself.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCT
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do
22 matches
Mail list logo
