If you don't already know, there is a good WSUS list at:
http://www.patchmanagement.org/wsusfaqs.asp
Harjadi, Yandi wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to make the downstream server to retrieve the updates
directly from MS WSUS server instead of upstream server in replica
mode ? I need to have 1
I have 2 seperate directories, I used static IP for the server and left it at dynamic for the xp.
I loose the tools cause of 2 things, am so lazy to install all that on the new windows 2003 server installation, besides if I actually wanted to do that most of the tools won't work, in addition
Hi joe,
I don't see where scavenging has anything to do with it. The *wrong*
SRV records are being produced on the child domain DCs. What I see on
my AD-integrated DNS server is just a reflection of what those DCs
register.
-mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what do you mean with The *wrong* SRV records are being produced on the child
domain DCs?
questions about this...
* On ALL child domain DCs?
* Do you mean the SRV RRs are in registered wrong in DNS, but the DCs itself
register the correct records or do you mean the SRV RRs are in registered
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DCs generating SRV records for 2 sites!?
Excuse me butting in mid thread, but if a DC was moved from
site A to B, then SRV records will exist for that DC in both sites, within DNS,
until old SRV records are removed thru scavenging.
Why not simply remove the 'incorrect'
I will be out of the office starting 01/03/2006 and will not return until
01/04/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DCs generating SRV records for 2 sites!?
Hi Neil/Jorge,
The child domain DCs
are generating SRV records (as seen in their local netlogon.dns and netlogon.dnb
files) for both their original site (to which they have subsequently
moved back into) and the other site
What is going to remove the records?
The DCs don't look in every site in DNS to see if there are records for
themselves registered. That is what scavenging is about, to remove old
records that are no longer active.
With that information you have given, are you sure your tests for Exchange
were
Rick Kingslan wrote:
Tomasz, I think that Mark is looking to populate his metabase with data
other than User 1, User 2, User 3, etc. with simple or blank attributes.
So, he's looking for stuff like Homer Simpson, with all of the user data,
then Marge, etc.
So stuill I don't think he will find
stop the netlogon service
delete netlogon.dns en netlogon.dnb
start the netlogon service
open netlogon.dns and which sites are listed?
have the child DCs been configured to cover additional sites?
Jorge
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thommes, Michael
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DCs generating SRV records for 2 sites!?
This is analogous to a client moving from one domain to
another. The client would create an A record in domainA (using DDNS) and then
also in domainB using DDNS, again. The A record in domainA would need to be
removed manually,
I utilise VBScript too, but I wanted user data with a little more substance.
500 names in an ldf file is a lot more use to me than a vbs file which creates
user 1, 2, 3 etc etc
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Onyszko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:49:22
Dear List,
I'm having trouble getting Windows NT 4.0 (SP6a) clients who get DNS data
including WINS server addresses to pick up new WINS servers through my DHCP
settings on my W2K3 (FFL) DHCP. I had an error in the DHCP address of one
of the WINS servers and I have corrected it on both of my
maybe stupid questions...
but are you WINS server IPs on the workstations also dynamically distributed by
DHCP or are these defined locally as static addresses?
Are you using both SERVER OPTIONS and SCOPE OPTIONS? Remember, if you changed
the WINS IPs in the server options and you still have
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] HAPPY NEW YEAR!
document
:
I haven't seen a generic user creation utility, however in similar situations I prefer to have a bit more control than that and would instead create a list of user names that I can easily glance at and know the originating directory.
If you truly want random names to work with, you may want to
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] DCs generating SRV records for 2 sites!?
Oh yeah, interesting point, the DCs might be covering that
site because nothing else is for the domain that the DCs are controllers for.
Good catch Jorge.
Another way to check this is with nltest
/dsgetsitecov
From:
Another approach that will work is to go to any good sized
'white pages' site and copy/paste a list of names to an excel spreadsheet.
Thengenerate the rest of the cells for each line based on this data.
Jerry Welch
CPS Systems
US/Canada: 888-666-0277
International: +1 703 827 0919 (-4
Another alternative which may be less prone to getting you
in some form of trouble is to take some source as described by Al or even from
your corporate directory and pull off all first, middle, last names and then
write a script to randomly slam them together in various combinations. You
Title: [ActiveDir] Updating client DHCP settings in Windows NT
Jorge,
Thanks for responding. The Windows NT clients have their WINS addresses
dynamically distributed. The static WINS entry fields are blank on the clients.
But I perceive you to be a frikkin GENIUS! I have just checked all my
Along those lines, sites such as http://www.census.gov/genealogy/names/names_files.htmlhave information you can use to seed the generator that would not be tied to any private information (that I can tell; I'm no lawyer though this is publicly available information).
I think something along the
Al,
This is what I was going to do, I was just hoping that I did not have to
reinvent the wheel.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Al Mulnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:37:27
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Request for Test AD Poplulation Data
{PAUSE} no no no we wanna see this...- {PLAY} --- INCOMING.SMACK! ;-))
just kidding! ;-))
hmmm...funny...
When a DHCP server distributes IPs for a certain scope it consolidates the
server options configured at server level and scope options configured at scope
level. If some option is
What's Microsoft's response to the availability of third party patches
for the WMF vulnerability?
Microsoft recommends that customers download and deploy the security
update for the WMF vulnerability that we are targeting for release on
January 10, 2006.
As a general rule, it is a best practice
Mark - something I did once that proved pretty easy is as follows:
1) Grab a list of first names and a list of last names from a genealogy site -
as many as you can, but make sure they are not the same number (i.e. 97 last
names and 93 first names)
2) make a spreadsheet with the last names in
Many thanks.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rich Milburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:49:46
To:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Request for Test AD Poplulation Data
Mark - something I did once that proved pretty easy is as follows:
1) Grab a list of
How does someone enable Windows Integrated Authentication
through a Group Policy. You will find this on the Advanced tab of Internet
Options.
Justin A. Salandra
MCSE Windows 2000 2003
Network and Technology Services Manager
Catholic Healthcare System
646.505.3681 - office
Regarding the June 10 WMF exploit patch release, can somone please point
me to Microsoft's article regarding the release.
Thanks,
Nav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 12:33 PM
To:
January.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/912840.mspx
Navroz Shariff wrote:
Regarding the June 10 WMF exploit patch release, can somone please point
me to Microsoft's article regarding the release.
Thanks,
Nav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/912840.mspx
January 10th...is the target.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Navroz Shariff
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 3:17 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE:
Thank you Susan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 3:27 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: WMF issue - patch on the 10th
January.
I recommend taking a look at the SANS Internet Storm Center
(http://isc.sans.org/) write up as well, including information regarding
an unofficial patch that is now available in MSI installer format.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thanks Jim and everyone else :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 3:33 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: WMF issue - patch on the 10th
My son is hard core on the security side. He has tested the heck out of
their patch. He claims the patch works and is a clean uninstall. No
comment on if it breaks anything else.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Salisbury
This may give you a starting point:
http://www.akomolafe.com/LinkClick.aspx?link=Create-Users-and-Sec-Group.vbst
abid=63mid=431
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCT
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is
All depends on who he asks Sadly, I didn't have time to dig it up before
jetting out for sunny, tropical, Madison, Wi this AM.
Sorry, Mark
From: Tomasz Onyszko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/03 Tue AM 09:49:22 EST
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Request
Everything I've tested so far, none of our software seems to have broken.
The MSI install and uninstall is nice and clean.
Phillip Partipilo
Parametric Solutions Inc.
Jupiter, Florida
(561) 747-6107
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
--- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A.
Subject: [ActiveDir] Enable Windows Integrated Authentication through GPO
: How does someone enable Windows Integrated Authentication
: through a Group Policy. You will find this on the
38 matches
Mail list logo
