TRUNCATE TABLE table
will be faster, especially for big tables. But this is going OT :-)
Cheers
Ken
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Thursday, 29 June 2006 3:05 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
http://storagemojo.com/?page_id=152
Found this interesting article about Google's clustering File System. Don't
worry, it isn't going to replace NTFS but it is an interesting approach to
cheap massive storage for clusters and it has Google in the title.
Maybe it will jog the MS Executives
I will be out of the office starting 06/29/2006 and will not return until
07/10/2006.
If you have an urgent question concerning the Active Directory Project
please contact DSC On-call.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
You are correct.
-ASB
On 6/28/06, Alex Fontana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct me if I'm over simplifying things here…but doesn't 2047GB = 1.99TB (not 2.47TB) since 1024GB = 1TB…right?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Medeiros, JoseSent: Wednesday,
I can think of 2 things that may help - 1 is the
netlogon log - and 2 is a network sniff from the client during the
"nltest /sc_query:domain"
The netlogon log may simply show the denieds but -
it may shows something else which may be useful as well.
steve
- Original Message -
I would do that if I was the DBA, however I am not and plan on sticking around
with my current employer for at least a few years, and hopefully till I reach
retirement age.
Jose
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer
Sent:
Hallow all.
I need
help in a problem I have after installing Service Pack 1
This
is the case:
I have
a windows 2003 Server (I Will call it SERVER01), without service pack 1
I created
a dns name like this
aplicacao.mycompany.com
Before
installing SP1, when I called
Return Receipt
Your [ActiveDir] Windows 2003 sp1 DNS problem
document:
Our AD (NTDS.dit) is at 1.7GB (approx. 250,000 users).
Should an offline defrag be performed at a regular interval?
Some articles I read only say it is only worthwhile if you are running low on space.We have plenty of drive space and RAM.
At what point should the AD be moved to 64 bit?
Hi,
I was curious to watch some LDAP referral traces
(OK, so it's been a quiet day) and am seeing some results I don't understand
among different tools. The queries are issued from within a child domain
to a DC in that same domain,searching for an object in another child
domain (root +
Hello Joshua,
Id look at the whitespace to determine when to offline
defrag a DC. You can enable the associated event which will tell you the amount
of whitespace by setting the registry key
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Diagnostics\6 Garbage Collection to
1 instead of 0
We also made GPT available on x86 with Windows Server 2003 SP1
however it is still not supported for shared disks.
Thanks,
-Steve
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jose Medeiros
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 12:01 AM
To:
Title: importance of gc._msdcs.mycompany.com A records?
What is the importance of the gc._msdcs.mycompany.com A records?
Environment:
1) Split DNS Unix Bind and AD integrated DNS
2) DCs use:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters]
I wasn't aware that this was a change in SP1, but it sounds
as if StrictNameChecking is enabled on your server after you've added SP1
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;281308)
You ca disable it in general by configuring the
DisableStrictNameChecking reg-key as the KB
1.7GB for 250.000 users is pretty small already - I guess
you don't use Exchange for messaging or use extremely few attributes of your
objects in AD. With the steps outlined by Ulf you should get a fair idea
on how much whitespace you currently have, however, you shouldn't expect to have
Sounds like hes probably just not populating many attributes. Ive
got double that DIT size at a client with half the number of users easily. Ive
also never had a reason to defrag a dit when I can just dcpromo down/up if I
think it will fix a database issue.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
16 matches
Mail list logo
