I hear Bill and Melinda are very charitable. Not sure if they'd wanna adopt a 6 foot 1 uber geek though. ;-)M@On 7/29/06, joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL. This was catch up week. I took it off from work and
ran around the house getting stuff fixed up etc and was only so so watching
email.
AllCan someone please explain the following observation?Installed a new R2 DC forest with one DC/DNS.created a new dns zone for use by a child domain (yet to be created). The zone is replicated to all domain controllers of the root domain. Enabled secure dynamic update only.
Installed a new child
I bugged the behavior many moons ago … to my knowledge, no fix
has appeared as yet. The precise cause escapes me but IIR it was related to
the ticket/token attached to the DHCP client service on the newly-born domain’s
DC. Two immediate solutions exist -
1.
reboot the new DC one
I have a Forrest with one forest root and one child domain.The child domain is running windows 2000 SP4 and the HQ sites are running windows 2003 R2 standard.I have the the child domain controller setup as an AD-integrated zone and i have the 2003 DNS servers setup to receive that zone as a
RE: RODC PAS
Oi, that will add some nice complexity to all of
this... :)
If I was looking to implement that I think I would look
at doing it in four levels so people don't shoot themselves... Everything,
everything but password info, core NOS info required for auth/authz
anywhere i can possibly look ?i'm running out of options and i have a long week ahead with microsoft PSS and Dell.On 7/29/06, HBooGz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:back to square one i presume ?
On 7/29/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:I think you are right..
Um, why? What value at this point?
Last I checked it supports limited applications that might want that information. And if you follow ~Eric's logic, they want to be secure out of the box. That would indicate that they want it to be as minimal as possible until and unless told otherwise.
To
I agree 100%, secure by default, make the admins learn how
to make it less secure. This has been one of the core security issues Microsoft
has had forever. It is good that this has turned around and while it pisses off
the lesser quality admins, it is good for Windows and the computing
Apologies as Im
reading in digest. But I just wanted to chip something into this surrounding OUs
versus groups as it was something that Ive been thinking about on my
mind-numbing commute.
I understood that RODCs
could be configured to be a read only subset of objects (users) from the
Is this on a separate network segment then
your other boxes that youre utilizing to ping it? If not I would
say make sure you put a laptop into a switch port that you are positive is in
the same vlan as this server and start doing some testing there to ping the
server. Have you taken a
I am not sure if I understand where you are going but let
me explain where I am coming from.
First, the passwords being there or not being there is not
important for this talk, that is already built in and will be there, now the
discussion is around everything versus an RODC PAS.
I think the story is the fault of the blog post writer.
That wasn't someone who actually knows what is going on, that was someone who
say an internal pres that was put on by a PM, probably Nathan, of what they are
thinking right now and the writer tried to get across the points as he/she
Hi Al,
I’m going to have to disagree here. I’d wager that the average
programmer has a better understanding of writing code that has:
a)
proper specifications and design
b)
robust error handling
c)
strong typing
d)
etc
Of course, there are always
Title: Message
Hello
All,
I have a round 350
users to be created with their mailboxes in windows 2003, what is the best way
to automate the process or delegate this job to two account
operators.
Any suggestions are
highly recommended.
Regards,
DISCLAIMER:
This electronic message
14 matches
Mail list logo
